Skip to main content

Is towerriga.com a Scam? Security Check Results - towerriga.com Reviews

towerriga.com favicon

Is towerriga.com Safe? Security Analysis for TOWER Events Venue & Concert Hall

Check if towerriga.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
WixJavaScriptSentryFacebook PixelMicrosoft Clarity
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:27:04 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.towerriga.lv is built on the Wix platform, utilizing standard Wix scripts and assets such as Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and Sentry for analytics and monitoring. The site lacks visible business content, contact information, and privacy or cookie policies, which limits its credibility and trustworthiness. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits further restricts domain legitimacy assessment. Technically, the site uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries but lacks security headers and comprehensive SEO optimization. Overall, the website appears to be a basic Wix-built site with minimal business presence and limited compliance with privacy and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

WixJavaScriptSentryFacebook PixelMicrosoft Clarity

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of explicit business information, company name, or description, it is difficult to ascertain the market positioning or business model of the entity behind www.towerriga.lv. The site does not provide contact details or legal information, which are critical for business credibility. The use of Wix suggests a small-scale or early-stage business or personal project. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The target audience and key services remain unclear from the available data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (3)

e*****@towerriga.lv
I*****@towerriga.lvEVENT
P*****@towerriga.lvQuestions

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are essential to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The presence of tracking scripts indicates moderate user tracking, but no privacy or cookie consent mechanisms are found, raising compliance concerns. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, indicating a low maturity in security governance. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates trust evaluation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WixJavaScriptSentryFacebook PixelMicrosoft Clarity
Platforms:
Wix.com
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Microsoft ClarityFacebook PixelSentry
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelMicrosoft ClaritySentry
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

48/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.230.63.107, 185.230.63.186, 185.230.63.171
Name Servers:
ns8.wixdns.netDNS only
ns9.wixdns.netDNS only
MX Records:
40: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
50: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
30: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025040114, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:132ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on Wix, leveraging its content delivery network and platform services. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools but lacks advanced technical SEO and accessibility features. Performance appears moderate based on the presence of multiple external scripts and assets. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the provided content. However, the lack of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt and areas for improvement.
Analyze Another Website