Skip to main content

Is trackonomics.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Trackonomics Reviews

trackonomics.net favicon

Is trackonomics.net Safe? Security Analysis for Trackonomics

Check if trackonomics.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle reCAPTCHAJavaScriptCSS+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 4:11:40 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Trackonomics is a technology company offering a SaaS platform focused on affiliate data aggregation, analytics, and link automation. Their services target content publishers, brands, and agencies seeking to optimize affiliate marketing efforts at scale. The website is professionally designed, built on WordPress with SEO and security plugins, and demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not evident. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the business.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle reCAPTCHAJavaScriptCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Trackonomics occupies a niche in the affiliate marketing technology sector, providing tools that streamline affiliate content creation and optimization. Their business model is SaaS-based, catering primarily to digital marketers and agencies. The company has maintained its domain since 2014, indicating operational stability. Social media presence on major platforms supports brand visibility. The lack of detailed contact information and compliance documentation may limit trust for some users. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@trackonomics.net

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, which are positive security measures. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers reduce the overall security robustness. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder effective communication during security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, but improvements are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Trackonomics

Description:

Trackonomics is a suite of tools that helps content publishers, brands and agencies create, analyze and optimize affiliate content at scale.

Key Services:
affiliate data aggregationanalyticslink automation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle reCAPTCHAJavaScriptCSSHTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional SaaS platform for affiliate marketing analytics.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

20/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none0
Aggregate Reports:a+63335866@fdmarc.net
Forensic Reports:f+63335866@fdmarc.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(243 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.11, 141.193.213.10
Name Servers:
ns-1221.awsdns-24.org
ns-1682.awsdns-18.co.uk
ns-60.awsdns-07.com
ns-988.awsdns-59.net
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:65ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a focus on SEO optimization. The use of Google reCAPTCHA enhances form security. Hosting appears to be via Amazon Registrar, suggesting AWS infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses modern web fonts and responsive design techniques. There is room for technical improvement in security configurations and compliance documentation.
Analyze Another Website