Skip to main content

Is traktors.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - traktors.lv Reviews

T

Is traktors.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Zemes rakšanas tehnika | TRAKTORS.LV - Traktors.lv

Check if traktors.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelCrazy EggTawk.to Chat Widget+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:50:43 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website traktors.lv is a Latvian language platform focused on the rental of earthmoving and transport equipment. It targets a general audience in Latvia, offering services that are described as fast, flexible, efficient, convenient, modern, and safe. The business model centers on equipment rental, specifically for construction and earthmoving machinery. The site uses modern web technologies including Vue.js, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Crazy Egg, and Tawk.to chat widget, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of visible contact information limit its compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS likely enabled but no security headers detected in the provided data. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, which restricts full domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site appears functional and business-focused but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security practices.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelCrazy EggTawk.to Chat WidgetOpen Sans Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the transportation sector, specifically equipment rental for earthmoving and construction. The website content suggests a small-sized company serving the Latvian market. The business model is straightforward, focusing on renting popular earthmoving and transport machinery. The use of multiple tracking and marketing tools indicates an intent to monitor user behavior and optimize marketing efforts. Lack of detailed company information, certifications, or trust signals limits the ability to assess competitive advantages or growth indicators. No related or partner domains were identified from the content. The company could improve transparency by publishing more detailed business and contact information.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (4)

4*****@traktors.lvTehniskais
2*****@traktors.lvPIESL
i*****@traktors.lvSazin
2*****@traktors.lvTehniskais

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. HTTPS is presumably enabled given the URL scheme, but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security were detected in the provided data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified from the HTML content. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and chat, which should be regularly audited for security risks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not present, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. Overall, the security posture requires improvements in headers, policies, and transparency to reduce risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Populārākās zemes rakšanas pārvietošanas tehnikas nomas. Ātri, Elastīgi, efektīvi, ērti, moderni un droši.

Key Services:
zemes rakšanas tehnikas noma
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelCrazy EggTawk.to Chat WidgetOpen Sans Fonts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)Crazy Egg
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Crazy Egg
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelGoogle Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing Tools:
Crazy EggFacebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is in Latvian language targeting local market.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@traktors.lv

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 71 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.60.5
Name Servers:
ns1.serveriai.ltDNS only
ns2.serveriai.ltDNS only
ns3.serveriai.ltDNS only
ns4.serveriai.ltDNS only
MX Records:
0: traktors-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024060400, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:105ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, likely Vue.js, and employs multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Crazy Egg, and Tawk.to chat. Fonts are loaded via preloading for performance optimization. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal with some meta tags but no structured data or rich snippets detected. Performance is moderate given the number of external scripts. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the provided data. Technical debt appears low but the lack of security headers and privacy compliance are notable risks.
Analyze Another Website