Skip to main content

Is transfair.ch a Scam? Security Check Results - transfair Reviews

transfair.ch favicon

Is transfair.ch Safe? Security Analysis for transfair

https://transfair.ch

Check if transfair.ch is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentSwitzerlandmedium
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagCookiebot+1 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:54:46 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

transfair.ch is the official website of a Swiss public service union dedicated to advocating for fair wages and modern working conditions for employees in the public sector. The website is professionally designed with a clear focus on its target audience of public service workers in Switzerland. It employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and appropriate security headers present, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly visible. The website complies with GDPR requirements, offering comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms and privacy information. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional image consistent with its business mission.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagCookiebotGlide.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

transfair operates as a membership-based union representing public service employees in Switzerland, focusing on labor rights and fair compensation. Its market position is that of an essential organization within the government and non-profit sectors. The business model revolves around member services, advocacy, and labor representation. The website's integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates an active approach to user engagement and outreach. The absence of direct contact information on the main page suggests that member interaction may be handled through other channels or member portals. The organization appears stable and well-established, with no indications of suspicious or fraudulent activity.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, which protect against common web vulnerabilities. The use of Cookiebot ensures compliance with cookie consent regulations and enhances privacy protection. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML content. However, the lack of a publicly accessible security policy or incident response contact information is a gap that could be addressed to improve transparency and readiness. There is no evidence of malware, phishing, or other security threats. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced documentation and disclosure.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

transfair

Description:

transfair ist ein Personalverband für den Service Public, der sich für moderne Arbeitsbedingungen und faire Löhne einsetzt.

Key Services:
Vertretung der Arbeitnehmerinteressen im öffentlichen DienstFörderung fairer ArbeitsbedingungenMitgliedschaft und Beratung
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagCookiebotGlide.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsAdobe Alloy
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Meta Platforms, Inc.Google
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagCookiebot Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses comprehensive cookie consent management via Cookiebot.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

22/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:178.77.65.102 include:vritec.ch include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net ip4:195.186.123.34 ip4:195.186.123.33 ip4:195.186.136.34 ip4:195.186.136.33 ip4:82.220.114.21 include:spf.eu.signature365.net -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 35 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:168.119.10.19
Name Servers:
fwmz.vritec.chDNS only
ns1.vritec.chDNS only
MX Records:
0: transfair-ch.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 25042201, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:178.77.65.102 include:vritec.ch include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net ip4:195.186.123.34 ip4:195.186.123.33 ip4:195.186.136.34 ip4:195.186.136.33 ip4:82.220.114.21 include:spf.eu.signature365.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack with asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts, improving performance and user experience. Cookiebot is integrated for GDPR-compliant cookie management. The site includes responsive design elements and accessibility features, contributing to good mobile optimization and usability. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly detected in the HTML content. The site benefits from proper meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social media sharing. Technical debt appears low, but continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to mitigate risks.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about transfair.ch

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website