Skip to main content

Is translations.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Tulkošanas birojs «Tatjana Judina un partneri» Reviews

translations.lv favicon

Is translations.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Tulkošanas birojs «Tatjana Judina un partneri»

Check if translations.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
Google AnalyticsWordPressFoundation framework (CSS classes and meta tags)Google Fonts
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 4:07:50 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Tulkošanas birojs «Tatjana Judina un partneri» is a small, established translation service provider based in Riga, Latvia, with over 21 years of experience. The company specializes in certified translations, document translations, legal and technical translations, targeting a general audience requiring professional language services. The website is built on WordPress with a Foundation CSS framework, incorporating Google Fonts and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and secure cookie settings; however, the absence of security headers and explicit privacy policies indicates room for improvement. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the website content and presentation suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate digital maturity with basic privacy compliance and business credibility.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsWordPressFoundation framework (CSS classes and meta tags)Google Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the language services sector, focusing on translation and certification services primarily in Latvian and Russian languages. The company has a localized market presence in Latvia, with a business model centered on service provision to individuals and organizations needing certified and specialized translations. The website content and structure indicate a stable, small-sized enterprise with a consistent brand image and a focus on quality and client deadlines. The lack of detailed contact information and privacy policies may limit trust for some users. The company leverages Google Analytics for user insights but does not appear to engage in extensive marketing or advertising partnerships. No related or partner domains were identified.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure cookie attributes, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which could hinder effective security management and user trust. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. GDPR compliance is partial, with a cookie consent banner present but no clear privacy policy. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, policies, and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Tulkošanas birojs «Tatjana Judina un partneri»

Description:

Tulkošanas birojs Rīgas centrā. Eiropas valodas, apliecinājums.

Key Services:
Tulkojums ar apliecinājumuDokumentu tulkošanaJuridisks tulkojumsTehnisks tulkojums
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsWordPressFoundation framework (CSS classes and meta tags)Google Fonts
Frameworks:
Foundation
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie set with Secure and SameSite=Lax attributes
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:91.203.68.160/27 +ip4:85.31.97.26 +ip4:85.31.97.22 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 37 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.238
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: translations.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025061900, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:160ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:91.203.68.160/27 +ip4:85.31.97.26 +ip4:85.31.97.22 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Foundation CSS framework, utilizing Google Fonts and Google Analytics. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with proper meta tags and SEO optimizations. Performance is moderate, with minified CSS and JS assets indicating some optimization efforts. However, no hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are technical debt areas. The use of Google Analytics indicates moderate user tracking, but no advanced marketing or advertising tools were found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website