Skip to main content

Is transparentadvertising.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - The Trade Desk Reviews

transparentadvertising.eu favicon

Is transparentadvertising.eu Safe? Security Analysis for The Trade Desk

Check if transparentadvertising.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
jQuery 3.6.0jQuery UI 1.13.1Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 6:00:47 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website transparentadvertising.eu serves as a European Unified ID (EUID) portal, enabling users to withdraw consent and object to targeted advertising based on their email or phone number identifiers. It is operated under the umbrella of The Trade Desk, a recognized player in the advertising technology sector. The portal focuses on privacy compliance, particularly related to GDPR, by providing users control over their advertising identifiers. The site is professionally designed with clear content and a user-friendly interface, targeting European users concerned about privacy and targeted advertising.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.6.0jQuery UI 1.13.1Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Trade Desk leverages this portal to enhance its privacy compliance and user trust by offering a transparent mechanism for consent withdrawal. The business model revolves around advertising technology and data privacy management. The portal's integration with The Trade Desk's main website and the use of reputable domain registration services indicate a strong partnership ecosystem. The service targets privacy-conscious consumers and advertisers needing to comply with European data protection regulations. The presence of a vulnerability reporting link further demonstrates a commitment to security and transparency.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to secure user input forms, mitigating bot and abuse risks. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and terms of service pages represents minor compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with additional security best practices and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The Trade Desk

Description:

This site allows users to withdraw consent and object to targeted advertising based on EUID, which transforms email addresses or phone numbers into advertising identifiers for relevant advertising.

Key Services:
Consent withdrawal for targeted advertisingObjection to targeted advertising based on EUID
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.6.0jQuery UI 1.13.1Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
The Trade Desk
Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website provides a portal for European users to manage advertising consent related to EUID.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains"

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No MX records found

MEDIUM

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:secops@thetradedesk.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

No MX Records

LOW

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:18.133.34.48, 35.177.245.196, 13.43.105.32
Name Servers:
dns1.p02.nsone.netDNS only
dns2.p02.nsone.netDNS only
dns3.p02.nsone.netDNS only
dns4.p02.nsone.netDNS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:48ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery and jQuery UI for UI components, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection. The HTML structure is valid and includes responsive design elements for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading and minimal external dependencies. SEO optimization is basic with meta viewport and charset tags but lacks advanced structured data or extensive meta tags. Hosting and CMS details are not explicitly detectable from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for modernization and enhanced SEO.
Analyze Another Website