Skip to main content

Is transpersonalaizglitiba.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - transpersonalaizglitiba.lv Reviews

T

Is transpersonalaizglitiba.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Security Verification

Check if transpersonalaizglitiba.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Othersmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:56:47 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website transpersonalaizglitiba.lv is currently inaccessible beyond a security verification page that employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 invisible challenge. This indicates the presence of a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or bot mitigation mechanism blocking direct access to content. Due to this, no meaningful business information, contact details, or policies are available for analysis. The technical infrastructure is minimal, relying on Bootstrap for styling and Google reCAPTCHA for security verification. The lack of accessible content and WHOIS data severely limits the ability to assess the website's legitimacy, business model, or compliance posture. Security-wise, the use of reCAPTCHA is a positive measure, but the absence of visible security headers and policies is a concern. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, business credibility, and privacy compliance due to the blocking mechanism and lack of transparency.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the current accessible content. The site does not expose any company name, services, contact information, or market positioning. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, preventing verification of registrant details or domain age. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators. The website appears to be in a protected or restricted state, possibly under maintenance or configured to prevent automated access.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture shows basic bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA v3, which is a modern and effective anti-bot measure. However, the absence of other security headers and lack of visible HTTPS enforcement details limit the security maturity assessment. The site does not expose any forms or inputs beyond the captcha token submission, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The blocking mechanism itself may reduce exposure to automated attacks but also hinders legitimate user access and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and expose standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page is a security verification challenge with Google reCAPTCHA invisible token and minimal content, indicating WAF or bot protection blocking full access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • Invisible captcha integration with periodic token refresh

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a security verification page using Google reCAPTCHA v3 invisible challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1288-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.transpersonalaizglitiba.lv
Issuer:R10
Valid Until:10/18/2025 (79 days)
SANs:*.transpersonalaizglitiba.lv, transpersonalaizglitiba.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.151.30.199
AAAA Records:2a07:7800::199
Name Servers:
ns1.zehost.netDNS only
ns2.zehost.netDNS only
ns3.zehost.netDNS only
ns4.zehost.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.stackmail.com
SOA:Serial: 1691266789, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:236ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for invisible bot protection. The HTML content is minimal, serving only a security verification page with a form that submits a reCAPTCHA token every 5 seconds. No CMS or backend platform is detectable from the provided data. External resources are loaded from trusted CDNs such as jsdelivr.net and google.com. Performance is likely moderate given minimal content, but user experience is poor due to lack of accessible content. SEO and accessibility are minimal due to absence of metadata and navigational elements. The site appears to be hosted on an unknown provider with no visible hosting details.
Analyze Another Website