Skip to main content

Is treehouse.finance a Scam? Security Check Results - Treehouse Reviews

treehouse.finance favicon

Is treehouse.finance Safe? Security Analysis for Treehouse

Check if treehouse.finance is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/amedium
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSS Modules
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:02:56 AM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Treehouse is a decentralized finance platform specializing in fixed income products for digital assets. It offers innovative yield solutions through its proprietary products such as tAssets and Decentralized Offered Rates (DOR). Positioned as a key player in the DeFi ecosystem, Treehouse targets crypto investors and digital asset holders seeking enhanced yield opportunities. The platform emphasizes decentralization, accuracy, and agnosticism in its financial products, aiming to unify on-chain interest rates and foster sustainable finance. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks like Next.js and React, delivering a responsive and well-structured user experience. Security is a strong focus, evidenced by multiple third-party audits, a bug bounty program, and an insurance fund to mitigate risks. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies and does not provide direct contact information, which are areas for improvement. Overall, Treehouse demonstrates a mature digital presence with a solid security posture and credible business model in the DeFi space.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSS Modules

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Treehouse operates in the competitive DeFi fixed income sector, leveraging innovative financial primitives to attract users interested in yield optimization. Its business model revolves around staking native tokens and liquid staking tokens to generate real yield, supported by decentralized governance and participation layers. The platform's partnerships with reputable security auditors and bug bounty platforms enhance its credibility. The absence of public WHOIS registrant data suggests privacy protection, common in crypto projects. Treehouse's ecosystem includes grants and participant roles such as operators and panelists, indicating a community-driven approach. The platform's growth potential is supported by its technical sophistication and strategic focus on decentralized finance infrastructure.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Treehouse exhibits a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security audits from recognized firms such as Trail of Bits, Sigma Prime, and HackenProof. The presence of a bug bounty program and an insurance fund further strengthens its risk management framework. However, the website does not currently implement or advertise standard security headers like Content Security Policy or HSTS, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. The lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency in security incident handling. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the platform maintains a robust security foundation suitable for its DeFi operations but should improve policy transparency and header implementations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to enhance compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Treehouse

Description:

Treehouse is the decentralized fixed income layer, building yield solutions and unifying on-chain interest rates through its products, tAssets and DOR.

Key Services:
tAssets staking and yield optimizationDecentralized Offered Rates (DOR)Governance and ecosystem participation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSS Modules
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Multiple third-party security audits
  • Bug bounty program
  • Insurance fund for risk mitigation

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft Clarity
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing Tools:
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional DeFi platform focused on fixed income products.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

35/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

DMARC Partial Enforcement

LOW

DMARC only applies to 10% of messages

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.treehouse.finance include:_spf.google.com include:spf.sendinblue.com mx -all v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com ?all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject(10% enforcement)
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@treehouse.finance

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 52 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:treehouse.finance
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/28/2025 (52 days)
SANs:treehouse.finance, *.treehouse.finance

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.32.101, 172.67.150.193
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3034::ac43:96c1, 2606:4700:3031::6815:2065
Name Servers:
jay.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
rachel.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381315435, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:62ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.treehouse.finance include:_spf.google.com include:spf.sendinblue.com mx -all v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website leverages a modern technology stack centered on React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and optimized performance. CSS Modules are used for styling, contributing to modular and maintainable code. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO optimization. Analytics tools include Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity, indicating moderate user tracking. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. The absence of certain security headers and privacy policies suggests technical debt in compliance and security best practices. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable platform but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy implementations.
Analyze Another Website