Skip to main content

Is trisarhitektura.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - trisarhitektura.lv Reviews

trisarhitektura.lv favicon

Is trisarhitektura.lv Safe? Security Analysis for tris – arhitektura

Check if trisarhitektura.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
WordPressjQueryMediaElement.jsGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:08:01 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website tris.arhitektura.lv represents a small architecture firm likely based in Latvia, focusing on showcasing architectural projects and providing contact information. The site is built on WordPress using the Semplice theme, optimized for portfolio presentation. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies such as jQuery and MediaElement.js, with Google Analytics integrated for visitor tracking. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure communication. However, the absence of security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners indicates room for improvement in security posture and regulatory adherence. The lack of visible contact details on the homepage and unavailable WHOIS data limit the ability to fully verify business credibility. Overall, the site is professionally designed with good user experience but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryMediaElement.jsGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Tris arhitektura operates as a small architecture service provider targeting clients interested in architectural design and project development. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on portfolio presentation to attract potential clients. The website's market position appears local and niche, with no visible partnerships or subsidiaries. The use of WordPress and Semplice theme suggests a cost-effective digital presence. The absence of detailed business information, certifications, or trust signals may impact client confidence. Growth opportunities could be enhanced by adding comprehensive contact information, certifications, and privacy compliance details.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are present, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR compliance indicators suggests potential regulatory gaps. Regular updates and implementation of security best practices are recommended to strengthen the security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Website for tris arhitektura, an architecture-related business likely based in Latvia, showcasing projects and contact information.

Key Services:
architecture designproject showcase
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryMediaElement.jsGoogle Analytics
Frameworks:
Semplice
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress site using Semplice theme specialized for portfolios

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "1"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.66.159
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1650794615, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:217ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Semplice theme, optimized for portfolio display. It employs jQuery and MediaElement.js for frontend interactivity and media playback. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site loads over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, contributing to secure data transmission. Performance is moderate with no significant issues detected in the HTML structure. Mobile optimization is good, and basic accessibility features are present. SEO optimization is basic with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are needed to modernize the infrastructure and reduce risks.
Analyze Another Website