Skip to main content

Is truepic.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Truepic Reviews

truepic.com favicon

Is truepic.com Safe? Security Analysis for Truepic

Check if truepic.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight TagBing AdsCookiePro Consent Management+4 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:23:23 PM
75
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Truepic is a technology company specializing in visual risk intelligence, providing businesses with tools to verify the authenticity of images and videos in the age of AI. Their platform focuses on fraud prevention, virtual inspections, and business credentialing, targeting industries such as insurance, lending, and product safety. The company positions itself as a trusted provider for businesses needing reliable visual verification to make faster and more confident decisions. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in relevant content, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, Truepic's website leverages modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, and CookiePro for consent management, hosted on Webflow's platform. The site demonstrates good performance, accessibility, and SEO practices. However, explicit security headers are not visibly implemented, and no dedicated security or incident response pages are published, indicating room for improvement in security transparency. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security policies and incident response contacts. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, although the professional website and consistent branding suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site maintains a good security posture but could enhance trust by publishing more security-related information. The overall risk assessment is moderate with recommendations to improve security headers, publish security policies, and clarify domain registration details. These steps would strengthen the company's trustworthiness and compliance posture in a competitive market.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight TagBing AdsCookiePro Consent ManagementWebFont LoaderGSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)Finsweet AttributesACSB Accessibility Plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Truepic operates in the visual risk intelligence sector, offering SaaS solutions that enable businesses to authenticate visual content and prevent fraud. Their market positioning is focused on industries requiring virtual inspections and verification such as insurance, lending, and product recalls. The business model is B2B, providing technology platforms and APIs to enterprise clients. The company demonstrates growth potential through diverse use cases and a clear mission to verify reality in the AI era. Partnerships and integrations with analytics and marketing platforms indicate a mature ecosystem. The absence of direct contact emails and phone numbers on the website suggests a controlled lead generation approach via contact forms. The company emphasizes compliance with privacy regulations, enhancing its appeal to enterprise customers.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Truepic's website security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, reflecting awareness of privacy compliance. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No public security policy or incident response information is available, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file further reduces the security maturity impression. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is good but could be significantly improved by publishing security policies, implementing recommended headers, and providing incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Truepic

Description:

Truepic Vision helps businesses trust visuals in the age of AI. Prevent fraud, verify authenticity, and make faster, more confident decisions.

Key Services:
Visual risk intelligenceFraud prevention and detectionVirtual inspection platformBusiness credentialing
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight TagBing AdsCookiePro Consent ManagementWebFont LoaderGSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)Finsweet AttributesACSB Accessibility Plugin
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party analytics and consent tools

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight TagBing Ads
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Bing Ads
Tracking Pixels:
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing Tools:
CookiePro Consent Management
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

100/100
Score
No issues found

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

22/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.vali.email include:stspg-customer.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 48 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(168 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
abby.ns.cloudflare.com
jerome.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382412591, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:80ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.vali.email include:stspg-customer.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted on Webflow's CDN, ensuring fast and reliable delivery. It uses modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP for animations and Finsweet Attributes for UI enhancements. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Bing Ads, indicating a comprehensive digital marketing strategy. CookiePro manages consent, supporting GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and publish more technical documentation related to security and compliance.
Analyze Another Website