Skip to main content

Is truffle.one a Scam? Security Check Results - truffle.one Reviews

T

Is truffle.one Safe? Security Analysis for Database Error

Check if truffle.one is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherGermanysmall
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 8:17:22 PM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website truffle.one is currently inaccessible due to a database connection error, resulting in no visible content or business information. The domain is registered with Cronon GmbH in Germany since 2019, indicating a legitimate registration. However, the lack of accessible content prevents a full assessment of the company's business model, services, or market position. The technical infrastructure appears minimal with no detected CMS, scripts, or security headers, and no HTTPS information is available, indicating poor security posture. From a security perspective, the site lacks basic protections such as HTTPS, security headers, and visible privacy or cookie policies. The database error represents a critical availability issue that must be resolved to restore service. No WAF or security challenge mechanisms are detected, confirming that the site is down due to backend failure rather than intentional blocking. Overall, the website's risk is elevated due to unavailability and lack of security best practices. The domain registration data is consistent and legitimate, but the absence of content and security controls significantly reduces trustworthiness and business credibility. Immediate remediation of the database issue and implementation of HTTPS and security headers are critical to improve the site's security and user trust.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the website's inaccessibility, no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the site content. The domain is registered in Germany with a reputable registrar and hosting provider, suggesting a small to medium-sized business entity. No information about market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The lack of contact information or policies further limits insights into the company's operations or customer engagement strategies.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is currently poor. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential risks such as data interception and clickjacking. The database connection error indicates backend instability, which could be exploited if not properly managed. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, and DNSSEC is not enabled, reducing DNS security. The site does not demonstrate compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations based on available data.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Restore database connectivity immediately to make the website accessible.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
10/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently down due to a database connection error

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.sendinblue.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com mx ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:rua@dmarc.brevo.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 59 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(354 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:141.95.106.48
Name Servers:
docks11.rzone.de
shades14.rzone.de
MX Records:
100: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
200: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2020063123, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:73ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.sendinblue.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a minimal HTML error page indicating a database connection failure. No CMS or frameworks are detected. Hosting is provided by Cronon GmbH in Germany. The site lacks HTTPS and security headers, and no external scripts or analytics tools are present. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The technical debt is high given the critical backend failure and missing security configurations.
Analyze Another Website