Skip to main content

Is trulia.com a Scam? Security Check Results - trulia.com Reviews

trulia.com favicon

Is trulia.com Safe? Security Analysis for Access to this page has been denied

Check if trulia.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/a
PerimeterXRoboto Google Fonts
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 10:13:54 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website www.trulia.com is currently inaccessible due to a PerimeterX Web Application Firewall (WAF) challenge page requiring captcha verification to confirm human access. This security measure blocks automated access and prevents retrieval of actual website content, metadata, or business information. The WHOIS query for the domain returned no registration data, indicating either an issue with the query or privacy protection, which limits the ability to verify domain legitimacy and registration details. Consequently, no privacy policies, contact information, or business details could be extracted from the provided data. The technical infrastructure includes PerimeterX security scripts and Google Fonts, but no other technologies or CMS platforms are detectable. Due to the blocking, the website's security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility cannot be properly assessed, resulting in a low AI score and limited insights.

Detected Technologies

PerimeterXRoboto Google Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content and absence of WHOIS data, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain name 'trulia.com' is known externally as a real estate listing platform, but this analysis cannot confirm current operational status or business model from the provided data. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The blocking by PerimeterX suggests a high-security posture on the front end, likely to protect against bots and scraping. Without access to the actual site content, no insights on market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments are available.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The presence of PerimeterX WAF indicates a proactive security approach to mitigate automated threats and abuse. However, the lack of visible security headers, SSL configuration details, or published security policies limits the assessment of overall security maturity. The absence of contact channels for incident response or vulnerability disclosure further constrains evaluation. The domain's WHOIS data absence raises concerns about transparency and trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture appears focused on perimeter defense but lacks publicly available security governance information.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive WHOIS domain registration information to improve transparency and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

PerimeterX Detected

The page is blocked by PerimeterX WAF with a captcha challenge requiring user interaction to confirm human presence.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Technologies:
PerimeterXRoboto Google Fonts

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
PerimeterX

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to PerimeterX WAF blocking with captcha challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:50.31.58.167 ip4:198.176.43.0/24 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com a:zgateway.zuora.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:00db9-7704@rua.dmarc.emailanalyst.com
Forensic Reports:00db9-7704@ruf.dmarc.emailanalyst.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: ms64417456.msv1.invalid

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(364 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.174.113.111, 3.174.113.49, 3.174.113.81, 3.174.113.46
Name Servers:
ns-1430.awsdns-50.org
ns-1580.awsdns-05.co.uk
ns-239.awsdns-29.com
ns-974.awsdns-57.net
MX Records:
10: trulia-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
32767: ms64417456.msv1.invalid
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 30s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:57ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:50.31.58.167 ip4:198.176.43.0/24 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com a:zgateway.zuora.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The technical infrastructure is heavily reliant on PerimeterX for bot mitigation and security challenges. The use of Google Fonts indicates standard web font usage. No CMS or hosting provider information is detectable. The site is currently inaccessible, preventing performance, SEO, accessibility, or mobile optimization assessments. The blocking mechanism reduces the ability to analyze technical debt or modernization opportunities. The site would benefit from improved transparency and accessibility balanced with security controls.
Analyze Another Website