Skip to main content

Is tskapnes.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Teātra studija KĀPNES Reviews

tskapnes.com favicon

Is tskapnes.com Safe? Security Analysis for Teātra studija KĀPNES

Check if tskapnes.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
JavaScriptCSSHTML5Google Tag Manager
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:41:43 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Teātra studija KĀPNES is a Latvian theatre studio focused on theatrical performances and creative arts. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image targeting theatre enthusiasts and the general public interested in cultural activities. The business model appears to be a small-scale cultural organization offering performances and creative team collaborations. Technically, the website is built on the Webnode CMS platform, hosted via AWS Cloudfront CDN, and uses modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS. Google Tag Manager is implemented for analytics and tracking purposes. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content is accessible and professionally presented. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the website is safe for general audiences and provides basic contact information via email and social media channels.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTML5Google Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The theatre studio operates in the cultural and arts sector within Latvia, targeting local audiences interested in theatre. Its competitive advantage lies in its online presence and active social media engagement across Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube. The business model is likely based on live performances and community engagement rather than e-commerce. There is no evidence of parent companies or subsidiaries. The website content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a positive market position as a small but professional theatre entity. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the website. The partnership ecosystem is limited to social media platforms and CDN providers.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@tskapnes.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No forms or sensitive data collection mechanisms were detected, reducing exposure risk. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response contacts or security policies are not provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security incidents effectively. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Teātra studija KĀPNES

Description:

A theatre studio named KĀPNES, presumably offering theatrical performances and related creative activities.

Key Services:
Theatre performancesCreative team collaboration
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTML5Google Tag Manager
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spfuser.webnode.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 61 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(348 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:3.73.27.108, 3.125.172.46
Name Servers:
ns1.register.it
ns2.register.it
MX Records:
10: mta-02.webnode.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spfuser.webnode.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Webnode CMS platform, leveraging AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, which supports good performance and scalability. The tech stack includes standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with Google Tag Manager integrated for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. However, the absence of advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries suggests a relatively simple technical infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present through meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities exist in security and privacy compliance areas.
Analyze Another Website