Skip to main content

Is tssgroup.sk a Scam? Security Check Results - TSS Group Reviews

T

Is tssgroup.sk Safe? Security Analysis for TSS Group

Check if tssgroup.sk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologySlovakiamedium
jQuery 3.4.1RequireJSGoogle Tag ManagerFontAwesomeGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 3:59:08 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

TSS Group is a well-established Slovak company specializing in the distribution and provision of security technologies, including object security, vehicle security, and GPS monitoring. The company targets security professionals and businesses requiring advanced security solutions, positioning itself as a regional leader with a comprehensive product portfolio and client support services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, a CMS named BUXUS, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS implied, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is partially met with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and business credible, with room for improvement in security and privacy transparency.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.4.1RequireJSGoogle Tag ManagerFontAwesomeGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates primarily in the technology and transportation sectors, focusing on security system distribution and services. Its business model is B2B, serving installers and security professionals. The presence of certifications like FAS and FASmini, client case studies, and active social media channels indicate a mature partnership ecosystem and strong market presence. The company has been active since 2003, suggesting stable growth and established operations. The website content and structure support effective customer engagement and product promotion, though direct contact emails and phone numbers are not explicitly listed on the homepage.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which are important for transparency and trust. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager requires regular auditing to prevent vulnerabilities. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from enhanced security best practices and clearer incident response mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

TSS Group

Description:

Distributor and provider of security technologies including object security, vehicle security, and GPS monitoring solutions. Offers product catalogs, training calendars, discount actions, and news updates.

Key Services:
Security systems for objectsVehicle security systemsGPS monitoring servicesTechnical support and training
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.4.1RequireJSGoogle Tag ManagerFontAwesomeGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

72/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spf.tssgroup.cloud include:spf.mailkit.eu ip4:90.64.245.0/26 ip4:81.89.48.143 ip4:81.89.48.5 -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@tssgroup.sk
Forensic Reports:dmarc@tssgroup.sk

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
18 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(361 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC ON
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:81.89.48.207
Name Servers:
ns1.webhouse.sk
ns2.webhouse.sk
ns3.webhouse.sk
MX Records:
25: rdweb.tssgroup.sk
100: maildca.tssgroup.sk
SOA:Serial: 2023101785, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:188ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spf.tssgroup.cloud include:spf.mailkit.eu ip4:90.64.245.0/26 ip4:81.89.48.143 ip4:81.89.48.5 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.4.1, RequireJS, and Bootstrap framework, managed via the BUXUS CMS platform. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with some optimization opportunities in script loading and caching. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates areas for modernization. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website