Skip to main content

Is tsswhg.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 郑州天顺食品添加剂有限公司 Reviews

Is tsswhg.com Safe? Security Analysis for 郑州天顺食品添加剂有限公司

Check if tsswhg.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingChinasmall
jQuery 1.8.3CSS AnimateSuperSlide.js
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 12:09:42 AM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

郑州天顺食品添加剂有限公司是一家位于中国河南省新郑市的食品添加剂生产和批发厂家,专注于卡拉胶、苯甲酸钠、丙酸钙、山梨酸等多种食品添加剂的制造与供应。该公司自称为中国食品添加剂十大厂家之一,面向食品行业的采购商和相关客户群体,提供多样化的产品和客户支持服务。网站内容丰富,涵盖产品展示、行业新闻及常见问答,体现出一定的市场定位和业务深度。技术基础基于WordPress平台,使用了较旧版本的jQuery和常见的网页动画库,网站设计和导航结构良好,支持移动设备访问,整体用户体验较好。安全方面,网站启用了HTTPS和内容安全策略,但使用的jQuery版本较旧,存在潜在安全风险。缺乏隐私政策和Cookie政策,未体现GDPR合规性,WHOIS信息缺失导致域名注册合法性存疑。整体风险中等,建议加强安全更新和合规措施。

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.8.3CSS AnimateSuperSlide.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

该公司定位于食品添加剂制造行业,主要通过生产和批发模式运营,目标客户为食品加工企业及相关采购商。其市场优势在于产品种类齐全和质量保证,且在行业内有一定知名度。网站展示了真实案例和营业执照图片,增强了客户信任。缺乏公开的注册信息和隐私合规声明可能影响部分客户的信心。公司未展示社交媒体或合作伙伴网络,营销和客户互动渠道较为有限。整体业务模式传统,依赖电话和在线咨询服务,未来可考虑数字化营销和合规提升以增强竞争力。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

150*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站采用HTTPS和内容安全策略,基础安全措施到位,但使用了过时的jQuery 1.8.3版本,存在已知安全漏洞风险。未发现安全事件响应或漏洞披露机制,缺乏隐私政策和Cookie同意机制,可能导致合规风险。WHOIS信息缺失增加了域名信任风险。建议更新前端库,完善安全头部配置,增加隐私合规文档,并建立安全事件响应流程以提升整体安全成熟度。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

升级jQuery及其他前端库至最新安全版本,减少已知漏洞风险。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

郑州天顺食品添加剂有限公司

Description:

郑州天顺食品添加剂有限公司是河南一家从事生产批发食品添加剂的厂家,公司主营生产产品有卡拉胶、肉桂酸钾、苹果酸、山梨糖醇、肉桂酸钾等食品添加剂,始终保证质量安全,种类齐全。

Key Services:
生产食品添加剂批发销售食品添加剂客户咨询服务
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.8.3CSS AnimateSuperSlide.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
51.la
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
51.la
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 84 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(320 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:175.27.244.145
Name Servers:
ns1.myhostadmin.net
ns2.myhostadmin.net
ns3.myhostadmin.net
ns4.myhostadmin.net
ns5.myhostadmin.net
ns6.myhostadmin.net
SOA:Serial: 2024071001, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:404ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于WordPress CMS,使用了jQuery 1.8.3、animate.min.css和SuperSlide.js等技术。页面结构清晰,响应式设计良好,支持移动设备访问。SEO基础较好,包含meta描述和关键词。性能表现中等,未见明显加载瓶颈。缺乏现代安全头部配置和隐私合规脚本。WHOIS信息缺失,可能影响域名管理和安全。整体技术架构适合中小型企业,但需更新技术栈和加强安全合规。
Analyze Another Website