Skip to main content

Is tulit.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - sia Tūlīt Reviews

tulit.lv favicon

Is tulit.lv Safe? Security Analysis for sia Tūlīt

Check if tulit.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
jQueryGoogle AnalyticsIncomedia WebSite X5 Pro 2019.3.17
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:36:48 PM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website tulit.lv represents a small Latvian construction company named sia Tūlīt. The site is minimalistic, serving primarily as a welcome or placeholder page with very limited content and no detailed business information or contact details. The business appears to target a general audience in Latvia, but the lack of substantive content and contact information limits its market presence and user engagement. Technically, the site is built using Incomedia WebSite X5 Pro 2019, incorporating jQuery and Google Analytics for basic tracking. However, it lacks modern security features such as HTTPS and security headers, and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy assessment, but the minimal site content and lack of trust indicators suggest a low maturity level.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle AnalyticsIncomedia WebSite X5 Pro 2019.3.17

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company sia Tūlīt appears to be a small construction firm based in Latvia, as indicated by the website title and metadata. The business model is unclear due to the absence of detailed service descriptions or contact information. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or trust signals that would indicate a strong market position or competitive advantage. The use of a basic website builder and minimal content suggests limited digital investment. No revenue streams or growth indicators are evident from the site. The lack of contact details and policies may hinder customer acquisition and trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a low security posture. It lacks HTTPS, exposing visitors to potential data interception risks. No security headers are present to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The site does not provide privacy or cookie policies, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is available. The use of Google Analytics without a consent mechanism further reduces privacy compliance. Overall, the site is vulnerable to basic security and privacy risks, which could impact business reputation and user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

sia Tūlīt

Description:

Sveiciena lapa

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle AnalyticsIncomedia WebSite X5 Pro 2019.3.17
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a minimal landing page with almost no content beyond a welcome message and a single image.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web16.garmtech.net a:ns2.garmtech.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:91.194.76.181
Name Servers:
ns1.garmtech.comDNS only
ns2.garmtech.comDNS only
ns3.garmtech.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.tulit.lv
20: mx2.garmtech.com
SOA:Serial: 2025070408, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:116ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web16.garmtech.net a:ns2.garmtech.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a dated site builder (Incomedia WebSite X5 Pro 2019) and includes jQuery and Google Analytics scripts. The HTML structure is basic with minimal content and no forms or interactive elements. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a critical technical deficiency. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with some inline scripts adjusting layout but no advanced responsive design detected. SEO optimization is minimal, with basic meta tags but no structured data or rich snippets. Performance is likely moderate given the simple content but could be improved with modern hosting and optimization techniques.
Analyze Another Website