Skip to main content

Is turtelpa.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - TUR_telpa Reviews

turtelpa.lv favicon

Is turtelpa.lv Safe? Security Analysis for TUR_telpa

Check if turtelpa.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
Google FontsJavaScriptCSSBerta CMS
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:21:08 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

TUR_telpa is a small contemporary art gallery and exhibition space based in Latvia, focusing on Latvian and experimental art. The website presents current exhibitions and artist residency programs, targeting art enthusiasts and the local community. The business model centers on providing a physical space for contemporary art exhibitions and supporting artists through residencies. The market position is local and niche, catering to contemporary art audiences in Latvia. Technically, the website is built on the Berta.me CMS platform, using standard web technologies such as JavaScript, CSS, and Google Fonts. The site is mobile responsive with a moderate performance profile but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic; HTTPS is assumed but not verifiable from the data, and no security headers or policies are present. There are no visible forms or data collection mechanisms, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement features. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which is a compliance gap. Contact information is minimal, limited to social media links without direct email or phone contacts. Overall, the site is functional and safe but would benefit from enhanced security, privacy compliance, and business credibility features.

Detected Technologies

Google FontsJavaScriptCSSBerta CMS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website serves a niche market in the arts sector, focusing on contemporary and experimental art exhibitions and artist residencies. It likely operates as a small independent gallery or cultural space without a large corporate structure. Revenue streams may include exhibition fees, artist residency programs, and possibly event hosting. The target customers are local art audiences, artists, and cultural participants. The partnership ecosystem is limited to social media platforms for outreach. The lack of detailed business information and contact details suggests a small-scale operation with limited digital maturity. Growth indicators are not evident from the website content. Strategic observations include the need for improved digital presence, enhanced trust signals, and compliance with privacy regulations to support future growth and credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is low to moderate. The website uses HTTPS (assumed from URL) but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options. No forms or input fields reduce risk of injection attacks, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting readiness for security events. The site does not use analytics or tracking scripts, which reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security culture appears minimal, with room for improvement in policy transparency, technical controls, and incident preparedness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify certificate validity.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

TUR_telpa

Description:

Contemporary Space for Art

Key Services:
art exhibitionsartist residencyexperimental art space
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google FontsJavaScriptCSSBerta CMS
Frameworks:
Berta.me CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a small contemporary art gallery and exhibition space in Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:your@email.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:206.189.242.57
Name Servers:
a.ns.berta.meDNS only
b.ns.berta.meDNS only
MX Records:
1: SMTP.GOOGLE.COM
SOA:Serial: 0, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:237ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Berta.me CMS platform, utilizing standard web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and Google Fonts. The site is mobile responsive and has a moderate performance profile. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no advanced SEO features detected. Accessibility features are minimal but functional. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal user data collection. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies, but the lack of security headers and policies suggests opportunities for modernization and improved security posture.
Analyze Another Website