Skip to main content

Is typeform.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Typeform Reviews

typeform.com favicon

Is typeform.com Safe? Security Analysis for Typeform

Check if typeform.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/alarge
Webflow CMSJavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsOneTrust Cookie Consent+4 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 6:24:45 AM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Typeform is a leading SaaS provider specializing in creating interactive, user-friendly forms and surveys designed to increase response rates without requiring coding skills. Their platform targets businesses and individuals seeking to collect data through quizzes, feedback, lead generation, and research tools. The company maintains a strong market position with a focus on design and user experience, supported by recognized certifications such as SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, underscoring their commitment to security and compliance. Technically, Typeform's website leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site is optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, providing a seamless user experience. Their use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital infrastructure with moderate user tracking balanced by GDPR-compliant privacy mechanisms. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, employs robust security headers, and integrates consent management tools to comply with privacy regulations. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact channels suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly impacts trust but is mitigated by the company's visible certifications and professional presence. Overall, Typeform presents a secure, professional, and user-centric platform with strong privacy compliance and technical maturity. Strategic enhancements in security communication and public incident response mechanisms would further strengthen their security posture and trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

Webflow CMSJavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsOneTrust Cookie ConsentAlgolia SearchUUID libraryLazyLoadOptimizely

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Typeform operates in the technology sector as a SaaS provider offering interactive form and survey solutions. Their business model focuses on subscription-based services targeting a broad audience including marketers, researchers, and businesses requiring data collection tools. The company benefits from a strong brand presence, consistent content quality, and recognized security certifications, which enhance customer trust. Their marketing ecosystem includes partnerships with major ad networks and analytics providers, supporting growth and customer acquisition. The lack of explicit physical addresses or direct contact details suggests a primarily digital-first operation. Typeform's competitive advantage lies in its user-friendly design and comprehensive feature set, positioning it well in the online form and survey market.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

u*****@typeform.comMy

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Typeform demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and integration of GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms via OneTrust. The presence of SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications indicates adherence to industry best practices. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and explicit incident response contacts limits transparency and may hinder rapid communication during security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vigilance to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is high but could be improved by publishing vulnerability disclosure programs and security contact information.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Typeform

Description:

Build beautiful, interactive forms — get more responses. No coding needed. Templates for quizzes, research, feedback, lead generation, and more. Sign up FREE.

Key Services:
Interactive form creationSurvey toolsQuizzesLead generationFeedback collection
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Webflow CMSJavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsOneTrust Cookie ConsentAlgolia SearchUUID libraryLazyLoadOptimizely
Frameworks:
Webflow
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of OneTrust for GDPR cookie consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure script loading with async and defer
  • No inline event handlers detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerOptimizely
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Optimizely
Marketing Tools:
Optimizely
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org include:sendgrid.net ip4:136.143.188.0/24 ip4:135.84.80.0/24 ip4:135.84.82.0/24 ip4:117.20.43.11/32 ip4:136.143.184.0/24 ip4:13.108.0.0/14 ip4:66.231.80.0/20 ip4:68.232.192.0/20 ip4:96.43.144.0/20 ip4:128.17.0.0/16 ip4:128.245.0.0/16 ip4:136.146.0.0/15 ip4:198.245.80.0/20 ip4:199.122.120.0/21 ip4:204.14.232.0/21 ip4:34.226.36.48/28 ip4:34.211.108.32/28 ip4:13.58.135.64/28 ip4:13.56.32.176/28 ip4:35.182.14.32/28 ip4:52.60.248.0/22 ip4:52.60.252.0/22 ip4:3.98.2.135/32 ip4:3.98.8.160/32 ip4:3.97.226.192/32 ip4:13.210.4.0/22 ip4:13.210.8.0/22 ip4:13.210.180.120/32 ip4:13.238.98.67/32 ip4:54.252.37.181/32 ip4:3.6.203.25/32 ip4:13.127.212.138/32 ip4:15.206.226.165/32 ip4:15.207.181.18/32 ip4:15.207.182.186/32 ip4:65.0.79.252/32 ip4:3.225.240.254/32 ip4:18.204.28.162/32 ip4:18.214.12.209/32 ip4:34.202.86.120/32 ip4:34.204.111.166/32 ip4:52.44.156.44/32 ip4:44.233.69.21/32 ip4:44.237.79.66/32 ip4:52.36.20.11/32 ip4:35.80.213.208/32 ip4:35.161.141.162/32 ip4:44.234.249.148/32 ip4:85.222.128.0/19 ip4:159.92.128.0/17 ip4:160.8.0.0/16 ip4:161.71.0.0/17 ip4:163.76.128.0/17 ip4:163.79.128.0/17 ip4:185.79.140.0/22 ip4:34.253.190.64/28 ip4:35.158.127.48/28 ip4:35.176.92.16/28 ip4:13.36.84.96/28 ip4:13.50.68.64/28 ip4:13.37.59.29/32 ip4:15.236.110.244/32 ip4:15.236.160.173/32 ip4:101.53.160.0/19 ip4:104.161.128.0/17 ip4:161.32.64.0/18 ip4:161.32.128.0/17 ip4:161.71.128.0/17 ip4:182.50.76.0/22 ip4:202.129.242.0/23 ip4:13.113.196.48/28 ip4:13.228.64.80/28 ip4:13.124.145.0/28 ip4:13.126.23.64/28 ip4:13.210.3.208/28 ip4:13.215.171.240/28 ip4:35.73.89.117/32 ip4:18.181.43.11/32 ip4:54.95.206.252/32 ip4:54.254.118.123/32 ip4:13.251.9.241/32 ip4:13.250.175.171/32 ip4:54.233.205.0/28 ip4:177.71.229.247/32 ip4:18.228.66.156/32 ip4:18.228.207.180/32 ip4:54.89.46.80/32 ip4:18.208.102.98/32 ip4:35.170.128.37/32 ip4:34.252.232.69/32 ip4:52.212.177.196/32 -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1392-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:reports@dmarc-report.typeform.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

90/100
Score

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.typeform.com
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M04
Valid Until:7/27/2026 (325 days)
SANs:*.typeform.com, typeform.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Potential Subdomain Takeover

HIGH

Subdomain staging.typeform.com points to unregistered service d1o7hancqope1k.cloudfront.net

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(3209 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.164.206.36, 3.164.206.35, 3.164.206.95, 3.164.206.9
Name Servers:
ns-14.awsdns-01.com
ns-1444.awsdns-52.org
ns-1725.awsdns-23.co.uk
ns-788.awsdns-34.net
MX Records:
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:52ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org include:sendgrid.net ip4:136.143.188.0/24 ip4:135.84.80.0/24 ip4:135.84.82.0/24 ip4:117.20.43.11/32 ip4:136.143.184.0/24 ip4:13.108.0.0/14 ip4:66.231.80.0/20 ip4:68.232.192.0/20 ip4:96.43.144.0/20 ip4:128.17.0.0/16 ip4:128.245.0.0/16 ip4:136.146.0.0/15 ip4:198.245.80.0/20 ip4:199.122.120.0/21 ip4:204.14.232.0/21 ip4:34.226.36.48/28 ip4:34.211.108.32/28 ip4:13.58.135.64/28 ip4:13.56.32.176/28 ip4:35.182.14.32/28 ip4:52.60.248.0/22 ip4:52.60.252.0/22 ip4:3.98.2.135/32 ip4:3.98.8.160/32 ip4:3.97.226.192/32 ip4:13.210.4.0/22 ip4:13.210.8.0/22 ip4:13.210.180.120/32 ip4:13.238.98.67/32 ip4:54.252.37.181/32 ip4:3.6.203.25/32 ip4:13.127.212.138/32 ip4:15.206.226.165/32 ip4:15.207.181.18/32 ip4:15.207.182.186/32 ip4:65.0.79.252/32 ip4:3.225.240.254/32 ip4:18.204.28.162/32 ip4:18.214.12.209/32 ip4:34.202.86.120/32 ip4:34.204.111.166/32 ip4:52.44.156.44/32 ip4:44.233.69.21/32 ip4:44.237.79.66/32 ip4:52.36.20.11/32 ip4:35.80.213.208/32 ip4:35.161.141.162/32 ip4:44.234.249.148/32 ip4:85.222.128.0/19 ip4:159.92.128.0/17 ip4:160.8.0.0/16 ip4:161.71.0.0/17 ip4:163.76.128.0/17 ip4:163.79.128.0/17 ip4:185.79.140.0/22 ip4:34.253.190.64/28 ip4:35.158.127.48/28 ip4:35.176.92.16/28 ip4:13.36.84.96/28 ip4:13.50.68.64/28 ip4:13.37.59.29/32 ip4:15.236.110.244/32 ip4:15.236.160.173/32 ip4:101.53.160.0/19 ip4:104.161.128.0/17 ip4:161.32.64.0/18 ip4:161.32.128.0/17 ip4:161.71.128.0/17 ip4:182.50.76.0/22 ip4:202.129.242.0/23 ip4:13.113.196.48/28 ip4:13.228.64.80/28 ip4:13.124.145.0/28 ip4:13.126.23.64/28 ip4:13.210.3.208/28 ip4:13.215.171.240/28 ip4:35.73.89.117/32 ip4:18.181.43.11/32 ip4:54.95.206.252/32 ip4:54.254.118.123/32 ip4:13.251.9.241/32 ip4:13.250.175.171/32 ip4:54.233.205.0/28 ip4:177.71.229.247/32 ip4:18.228.66.156/32 ip4:18.228.207.180/32 ip4:54.89.46.80/32 ip4:18.208.102.98/32 ip4:35.170.128.37/32 ip4:34.252.232.69/32 ip4:52.212.177.196/32 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Webflow CMS with a modern JavaScript-based tech stack including libraries for localization, lazy loading, and tracking. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for marketing and analytics, alongside Optimizely for experimentation. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with proper use of meta tags and SEO best practices. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, ensuring GDPR compliance. Hosting appears to be via Webflow or associated CDNs, providing reliable uptime and fast content delivery. The technical implementation reflects a mature and well-maintained infrastructure suitable for a large SaaS provider.
Analyze Another Website