Skip to main content

Is typo.social a Scam? Security Check Results - typo.social Reviews

typo.social favicon

Is typo.social Safe? Security Analysis for Trending - typo.social

Check if typo.social is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Mastodon 4.4.3ReactJavaScript ES ModulesSVG iconsCSS with integrity hashes
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:15:48 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Typo.social is an independent Mastodon instance catering to typo and type enthusiasts, providing a free social networking platform within the fediverse. The site offers trending posts, a profile directory, and an open registration model, positioning itself as a niche community server. Technically, it leverages Mastodon version 4.4.3 with React and modern JavaScript modules, delivering a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent or terms of service pages. Overall, the site is legitimate and functional but could improve in compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

Mastodon 4.4.3ReactJavaScript ES ModulesSVG iconsCSS with integrity hashes

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The platform operates as a small-scale social network server within the decentralized fediverse ecosystem, targeting a specialized audience of typography enthusiasts. Its business model is community-driven and likely volunteer-supported, with no evident monetization or advertising. The presence of an active user base (~700 monthly active users) and visible admin account indicates operational stability. External links to Mastodon resources and related social domains suggest integration with the broader fediverse community. The lack of formal business registration data and contact details aligns with typical independent open-source community projects.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

g*****@universeodon.comYou

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is moderate; the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. The absence of terms of service and security policies may expose the platform to legal and operational risks. No signs of malware or phishing were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a community server but should be enhanced for better protection and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Welcome to Typo.social! This is a Mastodon instance open to any typo and type enthusiastic. We are offering this service out of sheer courtesy without being held responsible for any disadvantages.

Key Services:
Mastodon social networkingPublic timeline and trending postsUser profile directory
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Mastodon 4.4.3ReactJavaScript ES ModulesSVG iconsCSS with integrity hashes
Frameworks:
MastodonReact
Platforms:
Fediverse
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Mastodon instance focused on typo and type enthusiasts.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin, strict-origin-when-cross-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

45/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:212.15.88.9
Name Servers:
docks09.rzone.deDNS only
shades04.rzone.deDNS only
MX Records:
5: smtp.rzone.de
SOA:Serial: 2022103029, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:45ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Mastodon open-source social networking platform, version 4.4.3, utilizing React and modern JavaScript ES modules. The front-end assets include SVG icons and CSS with integrity hashes, indicating attention to resource integrity. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no major errors or broken elements detected. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD for organization or breadcrumbs. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a community-driven social platform but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website