
Is typo.social Safe? Security Analysis for Trending - typo.social
Check if typo.social is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
Typo.social is an independent Mastodon instance catering to typo and type enthusiasts, providing a free social networking platform within the fediverse. The site offers trending posts, a profile directory, and an open registration model, positioning itself as a niche community server. Technically, it leverages Mastodon version 4.4.3 with React and modern JavaScript modules, delivering a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent or terms of service pages. Overall, the site is legitimate and functional but could improve in compliance and security transparency.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The platform operates as a small-scale social network server within the decentralized fediverse ecosystem, targeting a specialized audience of typography enthusiasts. Its business model is community-driven and likely volunteer-supported, with no evident monetization or advertising. The presence of an active user base (~700 monthly active users) and visible admin account indicates operational stability. External links to Mastodon resources and related social domains suggest integration with the broader fediverse community. The lack of formal business registration data and contact details aligns with typical independent open-source community projects.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
Security maturity is moderate; the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. The absence of terms of service and security policies may expose the platform to legal and operational risks. No signs of malware or phishing were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a community server but should be enhanced for better protection and compliance.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Welcome to Typo.social! This is a Mastodon instance open to any typo and type enthusiastic. We are offering this service out of sheer courtesy without being held responsible for any disadvantages.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a Mastodon instance focused on typo and type enthusiasts.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration
LOWCurrent value: "0"
Weak Referrer-Policy configuration
LOWCurrent value: "same-origin, strict-origin-when-cross-origin"
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No SPF record found
HIGHSPF helps prevent email spoofing
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 78 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings