Skip to main content

Is ualberta.ca a Scam? Security Check Results - University of Alberta Reviews

ualberta.ca favicon

Is ualberta.ca Safe? Security Analysis for University of Alberta

Check if ualberta.ca is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationCanadalarge
jQuery 3.6.0Font Awesome 6 ProGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight Tag+6 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 4:43:25 AM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The University of Alberta website represents a major Canadian educational institution with a strong market position as a top 5 university in Canada. The site targets students, faculty, and prospective students, offering a wide range of academic programs and research opportunities. The business model is that of a public university providing higher education and research services. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google Tag Manager, hosted on Cascade CMS. The site is mobile optimized and well structured, with good SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and multiple reputable analytics and tracking services in use, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are not clearly present in the provided content. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.6.0Font Awesome 6 ProGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight TagTikTok PixelMicrosoft ClarityCrazy EggTwitter Universal Website TagFacebook PixelLive Clive Cloud

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The University of Alberta holds a strong position in the Canadian education sector, serving a large student body of approximately 40,000. Its competitive advantage lies in its reputation, extensive program offerings, and research capabilities. Revenue streams likely include tuition, government funding, and research grants. The target customer segments include domestic and international students, researchers, and academic staff. The university maintains partnerships with various educational and research organizations, though no explicit partner domains were identified in the content. The website reflects a mature digital presence with consistent branding and comprehensive content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of multiple analytics and tracking tools from reputable providers. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests limited formal incident response transparency. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing clear policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

University of Alberta

Description:

The University of Alberta is a Top 5 Canadian university located in Edmonton, Alberta, and home to 40,000 students in a wide variety of programs.

Key Services:
Higher educationResearch programsStudent services
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.6.0Font Awesome 6 ProGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight TagTikTok PixelMicrosoft ClarityCrazy EggTwitter Universal Website TagFacebook PixelLive Clive Cloud
Frameworks:
Cascade CMS 8.13.0
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google site verification present
  • Use of multiple reputable analytics and tracking services

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityCrazy EggLinkedIn InsightTikTok PixelFacebook PixelTwitter Universal Website Tag
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
LinkedIn InsightTikTok PixelMicrosoft ClarityFacebook PixelTwitter Universal Website TagCrazy Egg
Marketing Tools:
Live Clive Cloud
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.ualberta.ca include:_spf.google.com ?all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:?all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2660 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:52.32.177.72
Name Servers:
name.ualberta.ca
nom.ualberta.ca
ns1.d-zone.ca
ns2.d-zone.ca
uans1prd.ualberta.caDNS only
MX Records:
5: mx.ualberta.ca
SOA:Serial: 21704, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:91ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.ualberta.ca include:_spf.google.com ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Cascade CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery and Font Awesome. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and alternate hreflang links. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the number of external scripts loaded. Accessibility features appear to be implemented at a good level. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which may impact privacy and security if not regularly audited.
Analyze Another Website