Skip to main content

Is ucshare.app a Scam? Security Check Results - ucshare.app Reviews

U

Is ucshare.app Safe? Security Analysis for UC Drive

Check if ucshare.app is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Ant Design (CSS classes prefixed with 'ant-')JavaScript
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 2:06:25 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website ucshare.app/login serves as a login portal for a service branded as UC Drive, likely a cloud storage or file sharing platform. The site is built using modern web technologies such as React and Ant Design, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure. However, the content is minimal, focusing solely on user authentication without additional business or policy information. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie policy, terms of service, or contact information, which limits transparency and compliance with privacy regulations. Security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of visible security headers or SSL details in the provided data. Overall, the site appears functional but lacks comprehensive compliance and trust indicators.

Detected Technologies

Ant Design (CSS classes prefixed with 'ant-')JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

UC Drive appears to target users needing cloud storage or file sharing services, likely operating on an account-based or subscription model. The absence of detailed business information, contact details, or legal disclosures suggests a small or early-stage operation. The use of React and Ant Design suggests a focus on user experience and modern UI design. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The business model likely revolves around digital service provision with user authentication as a gateway. Market positioning and competitive advantages cannot be determined from the available information.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is difficult to evaluate fully due to limited data. No security headers or incident response contacts are visible. The site uses HTTPS (inferred from URL), but SSL configuration details are unknown. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No security certifications or vulnerability disclosure policies are present. The site should improve transparency and implement security best practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure regulatory compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to be a login portal for a service named UC Drive, likely related to file sharing or cloud storage given the domain and title context.

Key Services:
User login for UC Drive service
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Ant Design (CSS classes prefixed with 'ant-')JavaScript
Frameworks:
React
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a login page for UC Drive service.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:47.246.110.142
Name Servers:
ns1.alibabadns.comDNS only
ns2.alibabadns.comDNS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:681ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website employs React and Ant Design frameworks, indicating a modern front-end technology stack. The HTML structure is well-formed but minimal, focusing on login functionality. No CMS or backend technologies are identifiable from the HTML. Performance appears moderate with no heavy scripts or external dependencies detected. Mobile optimization is basic, with a minimum width set but no advanced responsive design features evident. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta descriptions and structured data. Accessibility features are minimal, suggesting room for improvement in inclusive design.
Analyze Another Website