Is ufl.edu Safe? Security Analysis for University of Florida
Check if ufl.edu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The University of Florida website represents a major public land-grant research university in the United States, offering educational and research services. The site is professionally designed with excellent content quality, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Technically, it leverages WordPress CMS with modern frameworks and SEO tools, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, though some security headers and formal policies like privacy and cookie notices are missing. The absence of WHOIS data is typical for .edu domains and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, serving a broad audience including students, faculty, and the public.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The University of Florida holds a strong market position as a top five public land-grant research university, focusing on higher education, research, and community engagement. Its business model is public and educational, targeting students, researchers, and academic professionals. The website reflects a mature digital presence with strategic use of SEO and analytics tools. Partnerships and subsidiaries are not explicitly identified in the content. The institution's size is enterprise-level, consistent with its broad service offerings and national reputation.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks explicit security headers and publicly available security policies or incident response contacts. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms such as security.txt. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no detected privacy or cookie policies, which could be improved to align with GDPR and other regulations. The security score is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and formal policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to improve compliance.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
University of Florida
A top five public land-grant research university, the University of Florida creates a collaborative environment and accelerates future solutions.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
good
excellent
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a professionally maintained university site with rich content and structured data.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM9 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Weak SPF Policy
HIGHSPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings