Skip to main content

Is ukaop.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Association of Online Publishers Reviews

ukaop.org favicon

Is ukaop.org Safe? Security Analysis for Association of Online Publishers

https://ukaop.org

Check if ukaop.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaUnited Kingdommedium
JavaScriptTiny SliderGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v3LinkedIn Insight Tag
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:49:20 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Association of Online Publishers (AOP) is a UK-based industry body established in 2002 that represents digital publishing companies across various media sectors including newspapers, magazines, TV, radio, and pure online media. The organization focuses on advocacy, events, research, and providing resources to support high-quality original digital content creation and distribution. The website reflects a mature and professional digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and a consistent brand identity. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as Tiny Slider, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA v3, and is built on Craft CMS, indicating a contemporary and maintainable infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA for form protection but lacks some common security headers, suggesting room for improvement in hardening against web-based attacks. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive, indicating good compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Contact information is primarily via web forms, with no direct emails or phone numbers publicly listed. WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed response, but the website's professional presentation and content support its legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, privacy compliance, and business credibility, with moderate security posture.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptTiny SliderGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v3LinkedIn Insight Tag

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

AOP holds a strong market position as a key UK industry association for digital publishers, offering events, steering groups, research, and resources that cater to a broad membership base including major media companies. Its business model revolves around membership services and industry advocacy rather than direct commercial sales. The organization benefits from partnerships with reputable firms like Deloitte and maintains a visible presence in the digital publishing ecosystem. Growth indicators include active event calendars, research publications, and a diverse member directory. The website's integration of marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight Tag supports targeted outreach and member engagement. The lack of direct contact emails suggests a controlled communication channel, likely to manage inquiries efficiently. Overall, AOP demonstrates a stable and credible business operation within the media sector.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented to protect forms from automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the site's resilience against common web threats such as cross-site scripting and clickjacking. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks publicly available security policies or incident response contacts, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, while basic security measures are in place, there is room for strengthening the security posture to align with best practices and compliance requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers to improve protection against web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Association of Online Publishers

Description:

Formed in 2002, Association of Online Publishers (AOP) is a UK industry body representing digital publishing companies. They champion the interests of media owners from diverse backgrounds including newspaper and magazine publishing, TV and radio broadcasting, and pure online media. Their mission is to support these organisations in their commitment to creation and distribution of high-quality, original content for consumers.

Key Services:
EventsSteering groupsResearchResourcesMembership services
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptTiny SliderGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v3LinkedIn Insight Tag
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)LinkedIn Insight
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
LinkedIn Insight TagGoogle Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing Tools:
LinkedIn Insight
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:msgfocus.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 26 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(94 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:157.245.36.236
Name Servers:
ns67.domaincontrol.com
ns68.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
1: ukaop-org.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024031200, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:28ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:msgfocus.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Craft CMS and leverages modern JavaScript libraries including Tiny Slider for UI components, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility practices. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and canonical links. The technical stack is contemporary and supports a professional user experience. However, the lack of some security headers and limited hosting information suggest opportunities for infrastructure hardening and transparency improvements.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about ukaop.org

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website