Skip to main content

Is ukgbc.org a Scam? Security Check Results - UK Green Building Council Reviews

ukgbc.org favicon

Is ukgbc.org Safe? Security Analysis for UK Green Building Council

Check if ukgbc.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyUnited Kingdommedium
WordPressjQueryYoast SEOAdvanced Custom Fields ProGoogle Tag Manager+3 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 1:45:02 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

UK Green Building Council (UKGBC) is a well-established non-profit organization founded in 2006, dedicated to transforming the sustainability of the built environment in the UK. The website serves as a comprehensive resource hub for industry professionals, policymakers, and sustainability advocates, offering educational content, policy advocacy, and collaborative forums focused on net zero carbon buildings, circular economy, and climate resilience. The organization positions itself as a leading voice in the UK's sustainable building sector, supported by a membership-driven model and extensive industry engagement.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryYoast SEOAdvanced Custom Fields ProGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarPlausible AnalyticsShortPixel Image Optimization

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

UKGBC operates primarily in the energy, real estate, and non-profit sectors, leveraging a membership-based business model to drive industry-wide change. Its competitive advantage lies in its authoritative position on sustainability standards and its role as a convener of stakeholders across the built environment. The website reflects a mature digital presence with strong SEO, content depth, and active social media channels. The organization appears to have stable growth indicators and a strategic focus on systems change and national collaboration, although direct revenue streams are not publicly detailed.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses modern security best practices such as cookie consent mechanisms and asynchronous loading of third-party scripts. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and several security headers are not explicitly detected, indicating room for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contacts suggests an opportunity to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional hardening measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

UK Green Building Council

Description:

UKGBC is the membership-led industry network radically transforming the sustainability of the built environment.

Key Services:
Industry networkingSustainability advocacyEducational programs and eventsResearch and resources on net zero carbon buildingsPolicy and standards development
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryYoast SEOAdvanced Custom Fields ProGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarPlausible AnalyticsShortPixel Image Optimization
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No DNSSEC enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Hotjar with async loading
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
HotjarPlausible AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
HotjarPlausible Analytics
Marketing Tools:
HotjarPlausible Analytics
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

35/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF DNS Lookup Limit Exceeded

HIGH

SPF record requires 11 DNS lookups (max 10)

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ptr include:eu._netblocks.mimecast.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com include:smtp.sendgrid.net ip4:168.245.53.222 include:hireful.co.uk include:sparkpostmail.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ip4:37.128.12 8.132 ip4:31.25.185.66 a:earthab4.memset.net ~all
DNS Lookups:11/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 35 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
19 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(166 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:162.159.134.42
Name Servers:
ns41.domaincontrol.com
ns42.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
10: eu-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
10: eu-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 2024121101, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:71ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ptr include:eu._netblocks.mimecast.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com include:smtp.sendgrid.net ip4:168.245.53.222 include:hireful.co.uk include:sparkpostmail.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ip4:37.128.12 8.132 ip4:31.25.185.66 a:earthab4.memset.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Yoast SEO, and advanced custom fields. It integrates analytics and user behavior tracking tools such as Hotjar, Plausible Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses image optimization via ShortPixel and asynchronous script loading to enhance user experience. Technical debt appears low, but enabling DNSSEC and improving security headers would further strengthen the infrastructure.
Analyze Another Website