Skip to main content

Is untitledartfairs.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Untitled Art Fairs Reviews

untitledartfairs.com favicon

Is untitledartfairs.com Safe? Security Analysis for Untitled Art Fairs

Check if untitledartfairs.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
ReactGatsbyCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 9:16:04 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Untitled Art Fairs operates as an organizer of contemporary art fairs, providing a platform for artists and galleries to showcase their work and for visitors to purchase tickets. The website is built using modern web technologies such as React and Gatsby, hosted with DNS services from Cloudflare, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site design is professional and mobile-optimized, offering a good user experience, although it lacks comprehensive privacy and security policies. Security posture is basic with domain registration protections but missing critical security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Detected Technologies

ReactGatsbyCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets a niche market of art collectors, galleries, and enthusiasts, focusing on event organization and ticket sales. Founded in 2016, the company maintains a consistent domain registration and branding. The business model revolves around hosting art fairs and promoting artists, with no detected partnerships or subsidiaries. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, but lacks explicit trust signals such as certifications or testimonials. Growth potential could be enhanced by adding more transparent business and contact information.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

6*****@untitledartfairs.comJoin
l*****@untitledartfairs.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity is basic. The domain is protected with standard registrar locks but lacks DNSSEC and security headers like CSP or HSTS. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, and no security contact emails are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate but improvements are needed to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Untitled Art Fairs

Description:

Untitled Art Fairs is an organization that hosts contemporary art fairs, showcasing artists and galleries. The website serves as a platform to provide information about events, artists, and ticketing.

Key Services:
Art fair event organizationTicket salesArtist and gallery promotion
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactGatsbyCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
ReactGatsby
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.mtasv.net include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.60.5
Name Servers:
carol.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
newt.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
20: us-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 2382041253, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:102ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.mtasv.net include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern React and Gatsby framework, which supports good performance and mobile responsiveness. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, but no CDN or advanced hosting details were detected. The HTML is valid and well-structured, though no CMS or backend platform was identified. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data. Accessibility features are present but limited. The site performs moderately well but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website