Skip to main content

Is upetravel.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Upe Travel Reviews

S

Is upetravel.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Upe Travel

Check if upetravel.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
jQuery 1.10.2jQuery UI 1.11.2Nivo SliderLightbox 2.6Google Analytics+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:03:59 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA Upe Travel is a Latvian transport and travel service provider operating since 2003 with a subsidiary founded in 2011. The company offers bus, minibus, and car rental services, catering to both inbound and outbound tourism markets. It serves tens of thousands of customers annually and maintains partnerships with leading Baltic tourism companies. The website content is primarily in Latvian with multilingual support, presenting basic business information and partner logos. Technically, the site uses older JavaScript libraries and lacks HTTPS on resources, which poses security risks. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for user tracking, but no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor privacy compliance. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security headers, and no contact information is provided on the site. Overall, the site is functional but requires significant improvements in security, privacy, and contact transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.10.2jQuery UI 1.11.2Nivo SliderLightbox 2.6Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFont Awesome 4.5.0

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a regional transport service provider with a focus on tourism and corporate clients. Its competitive advantage lies in long-term partnerships and experience servicing high-profile delegations. The business model revolves around vehicle rental and transport logistics. Growth indicators include EU funding support for digitalization efforts. The partnership ecosystem includes notable Baltic tourism companies. However, the website lacks detailed contact and compliance information, which may impact customer confidence. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused niche in transportation within Latvia.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS on all resources, lack of security headers, and use of outdated libraries expose the site to potential vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policies are not disclosed. The site does not implement secure forms or data protection mechanisms. These gaps pose risks to user data confidentiality and business reputation. Immediate remediation is recommended to implement HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement full HTTPS across the website and all resources to secure data transmission.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Upe Travel

Description:

SIA Upes projekts operates since 2003 and founded its subsidiary SIA Upe Travel in 2011. The company provides travel and transport services including bus, minibus, and car rental with or without driver. It serves 20,000-30,000 customers annually and collaborates with leading Baltic tourism companies. It supports both inbound and outbound tourism and has provided transport for high-profile delegations and visits.

Key Services:
bus rentalminibus rentalcar rental with or without drivertransport services for delegations and events
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.10.2jQuery UI 1.11.2Nivo SliderLightbox 2.6Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFont Awesome 4.5.0
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'dkim' uses 336-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:80.81.57.70 ip4:80.81.57.71 ?all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:?all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:dkim(336-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 38 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

5 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

50/100
Score

Insufficient Name Servers

MEDIUM

Domain has only 1 name server (minimum 2 recommended)

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:195.13.228.123
Name Servers:
web.hosts.lvDNS only
MX Records:
5: mail.upetravel.lv
SOA:Serial: 1364501869, TTL: 38400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:100ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:80.81.57.70 ip4:80.81.57.71 ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.10.2 and jQuery UI 1.11.2, along with plugins such as Nivo Slider and Lightbox 2.6. Resources are loaded over HTTP, which is insecure. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for tracking. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility. Performance is moderate but could be improved by updating technologies and enforcing HTTPS. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content.
Analyze Another Website