Is urbanscooter.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Urbanscooter.lv
Check if urbanscooter.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Urbanscooter.lv is an e-commerce website specializing in the sale of scooters and related urban mobility products, targeting consumers interested in personal transportation solutions. The website is built on the OpenCart platform using the Journal3 theme, incorporating modern web technologies such as Google Fonts and Facebook Pixel for marketing and tracking purposes. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and user experience, with clear navigation and relevant content focused on its product offerings. However, the absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as missing contact and security information, limits its compliance posture and trustworthiness. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, restricting the ability to verify domain legitimacy and registration details. Security headers are not detected, and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, indicating room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency to improve trust and reduce risk.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business operates in the e-commerce retail sector, focusing on scooters and urban mobility products, likely serving a small to medium-sized market primarily in Latvia. The business model is direct online sales, targeting consumers seeking personal electric scooters and related accessories. The website's use of Facebook Pixel indicates active marketing and retargeting efforts. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies from the available data. The lack of detailed business information, such as company registration or VAT numbers, and absence of contact details, limits the ability to assess business credibility fully. The site content quality and branding consistency are good, supporting a positive customer experience. However, the lack of privacy and security policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (2)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed due to lack of SSL configuration details. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options are detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The site uses third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel, which introduces tracking but no visible vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. The absence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and incident response contacts indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR and related regulations. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure programs are found, limiting transparency and responsiveness to security issues. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts to enhance security maturity.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
E-commerce website selling scooters and related products.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 41 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings