Skip to main content

Is url-encode-decode.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Dan's Tools Reviews

url-encode-decode.com favicon

Is url-encode-decode.com Safe? Security Analysis for Dan's Tools

Check if url-encode-decode.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5Bootstrap 3.4.1jQuery 2.2.4Font Awesome 4.0.3Google Analytics+1 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 5:32:36 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.url-encode-decode.com is an online utility tool focused on URL encoding and decoding, providing users with a free service to convert text strings into percent-encoded formats compliant with URI standards. It is part of the Dan's Tools suite of web development utilities, targeting developers and general users needing encoding services. The site is supported primarily through advertising and uses Google Analytics for traffic monitoring. Technically, the site employs Bootstrap 3, jQuery, and Font Awesome, with assets served partly via Cloudfront CDN. The design is functional and mobile responsive, with good content quality and clear navigation. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms, which impacts its privacy compliance posture. WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the site content and branding suggest a legitimate operation within a niche market. Overall, the site scores moderately on AI evaluation, with recommendations to improve security headers, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency.

Detected Technologies

HTML5Bootstrap 3.4.1jQuery 2.2.4Font Awesome 4.0.3Google AnalyticsGoogle Adsense

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates as a small-scale technology service provider offering free web tools primarily for developers and technical users. Its market position is niche, focusing on encoding and decoding utilities within the broader web development ecosystem. Revenue is likely generated through advertising partnerships such as Google Adsense and Ezoic. The company behind the site is Dan's Tools, which maintains multiple related utility domains, indicating a partnership ecosystem. The absence of detailed business contact information and domain registration data limits full business credibility assessment. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the presence of multiple related tools suggests a strategy of providing complementary services to attract a technical audience.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML and uses standard third-party libraries, though some are outdated (e.g., Bootstrap 3.4.1). There is no evidence of a formal security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking cookie consent banners and GDPR indicators. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern for trust and legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Dan's Tools

Description:

Online tool for URL encoding and decoding text strings, converting text into percent encoded strings for URI compatibility.

Key Services:
URL encodingURL decodingRelated web development tools
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5Bootstrap 3.4.1jQuery 2.2.4Font Awesome 4.0.3Google AnalyticsGoogle Adsense
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS assumed but not confirmed from data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseEzoic
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a free online utility tool for URL encoding and decoding.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

98 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(364 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.200.98.251, 34.202.133.59
Name Servers:
ns-108.awsdns-13.com
ns-1161.awsdns-17.org
ns-1799.awsdns-32.co.uk
ns-926.awsdns-51.net
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:97ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional web stack with Bootstrap 3.4.1, jQuery 2.2.4, and Font Awesome 4.0.3, which are somewhat dated but still functional. Assets are partially served via Cloudfront CDN, improving load times. Google Analytics and Adsense scripts are integrated for analytics and monetization. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO meta tags. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external resources. Technical debt is present due to older libraries and lack of modern security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve accessibility, and implement stronger security controls.
Analyze Another Website