Skip to main content

Is userevidence.com a Scam? Security Check Results - UserEvidence Reviews

userevidence.com favicon

Is userevidence.com Safe? Security Analysis for UserEvidence

Check if userevidence.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WordPress 6.8.2Elementor 3.29.0Yoast SEO PremiumjQuery 3.7.1Bootstrap+5 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:22:33 PM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

UserEvidence is a specialized Customer Evidence Platform targeting B2B software, product, and hardware companies. The platform focuses on automating the collection and curation of customer feedback, success stories, and verified case studies to support go-to-market teams. The company was founded in 2020, and its website reflects a professional SaaS business model with a clear focus on social proof and marketing automation services. The target audience is primarily B2B organizations seeking to enhance their customer validation and marketing collateral. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and leverages modern marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is hosted with DNS managed by Google Cloud and domain registration via Squarespace Domains, indicating a reliable infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization are good, with SEO best practices implemented through Yoast SEO Premium. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. Cookie consent is actively managed, but there is a lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No security headers were detected in the provided content, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which are areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, UserEvidence presents a trustworthy and professional online presence suitable for its market niche. The absence of direct contact information and formal privacy or terms pages in the analyzed content slightly reduces privacy compliance scores. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security and incident response policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Elementor 3.29.0Yoast SEO PremiumjQuery 3.7.1BootstrapCookiebotGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpot AnalyticsMicrosoft ClaritySequel video toolkit

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

UserEvidence occupies a niche in the B2B SaaS market focused on customer evidence and social proof automation. Its competitive advantage lies in automating the generation of verified case studies and testimonials, which are critical for GTM teams in software and hardware sectors. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, targeting mid-size to small enterprises. The company appears to have a focused partnership ecosystem with integrations to marketing and analytics platforms like HubSpot and LinkedIn. Growth indicators include the use of advanced marketing tools and a modern website infrastructure. However, the lack of visible contact details and formal policies may impact customer trust and conversion. The company should consider expanding transparency and compliance documentation to strengthen market position.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of UserEvidence is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized domain transfers or deletions. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies or incident response contacts are gaps. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks, though no direct vulnerabilities were detected in the content. The company should prioritize implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security and incident response information to improve security maturity and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

UserEvidence

Description:

UserEvidence is the Customer Evidence Platform that lets you collect feedback, curate success stories, and create content that credibly proves the value of your product.

Key Services:
Collect feedbackCurate success storiesCreate verified case studiesGenerate testimonials and stats
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Elementor 3.29.0Yoast SEO PremiumjQuery 3.7.1BootstrapCookiebotGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpot AnalyticsMicrosoft ClaritySequel video toolkit
Frameworks:
WordPressElementor
Platforms:
Squarespace Domains (Registrar)Google Cloud DNS (Name servers)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security status domain statuses clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
HubSpot AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Facebook Ads (hsadspixel.net)
Tracking Pixels:
HubSpot AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityG2 tracking
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotCookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:19880008.spf10.hubspotemail.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1096-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:162.159.135.42
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-b1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-b2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-b3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-b4.googledomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 72, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:49ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:19880008.spf10.hubspotemail.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and uses Yoast SEO Premium for search optimization. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The domain is registered with Squarespace Domains and DNS is managed via Google Cloud name servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Opportunities exist to improve technical security by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional SaaS business but could benefit from enhanced security hardening and compliance documentation.
Analyze Another Website