Skip to main content

Is userfeedback.com a Scam? Security Check Results - MonsterInsights, LLC Reviews

userfeedback.com favicon

Is userfeedback.com Safe? Security Analysis for MonsterInsights, LLC

Check if userfeedback.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WordPressPHPJavaScriptjQueryGoogle Analytics+7 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:18:30 PM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

UserFeedback is a WordPress plugin product offered by MonsterInsights, LLC, focused on enabling website owners to collect real-time user feedback, conduct surveys including NPS, and analyze user behavior with heatmaps and AI-generated summaries. The company positions itself as a market leader with over 300,000 users and a comprehensive suite of integrations and features tailored for WordPress users. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content, targeting marketers and site owners seeking to enhance engagement and conversion through user insights. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including JavaScript libraries, Google Analytics, and multiple marketing and affiliate tools. The site demonstrates good SEO and performance practices, asynchronous script loading, and consent management for privacy compliance. However, explicit security headers are not clearly present, and no dedicated security or incident response policies are published. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy. The privacy policy and terms of service are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, supporting a strong privacy stance. Contact information is available, including a phone number, but no direct company emails were found. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for a SaaS WordPress plugin business, but the missing WHOIS data and lack of explicit security policies suggest areas for improvement in transparency and security governance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPJavaScriptjQueryGoogle AnalyticsMonsterInsights pluginOptinMonsterAffiliateWPEasy Digital DownloadsSeedProdVimeo Player APIYouTube Iframe API

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

UserFeedback operates in the technology sector, specifically targeting WordPress website owners and marketers. Its business model is subscription-based SaaS, offering unlimited surveys, responses, and integrations. The company leverages partnerships with well-known WordPress ecosystem brands such as MonsterInsights, WPForms, OptinMonster, and others, enhancing its market reach and credibility. The product's competitive advantage lies in its ease of use, no-code setup, powerful targeting, and AI-driven insights. The presence of a large user base (300k+) indicates strong market adoption. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear branding and comprehensive support resources. Growth indicators include extensive integrations and marketing automation capabilities. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing security transparency and domain legitimacy to strengthen trust further.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

561*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses asynchronous loading of scripts to optimize performance and security. Consent management for cookies is implemented, indicating privacy awareness. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No evidence of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data was found. The absence of a published security policy or incident response plan reduces transparency and preparedness perception. WHOIS data is missing, which is a red flag for domain legitimacy and could indicate privacy protection or data retrieval issues. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for improvement in policy publication and header implementation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

MonsterInsights, LLC

Description:

UserFeedback makes it easy to collect feedback from your website so that you can increase engagement, create great content, and make more money inside WordPress.

Key Services:
User feedback collectionSurveys and NPS reportsHeatmapsAI summariesCustom brandingAdvanced targetingIntegrations with 1000s of apps
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPJavaScriptjQueryGoogle AnalyticsMonsterInsights pluginOptinMonsterAffiliateWPEasy Digital DownloadsSeedProdVimeo Player APIYouTube Iframe API
Frameworks:
WordPress CMS
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Asynchronous loading of scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMonsterInsights
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsOptinMonster
Tracking Pixels:
DripMonsterInsightsSimplestats
Marketing Tools:
OptinMonsterDrip
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15768000"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:re+xtcxzcldq1z@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:userfeedback.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/20/2025 (44 days)
SANs:userfeedback.com, *.userfeedback.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(849 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.12.116, 104.18.13.116
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:d74, 2606:4700::6812:c74
Name Servers:
ali.ns.cloudflare.com
hugh.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382578025, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:55ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern technology stack including PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, and integrations with Google Analytics and MonsterInsights. It uses multiple marketing and affiliate plugins such as OptinMonster, AffiliateWP, and Easy Digital Downloads. Video tracking is implemented via Vimeo and YouTube APIs. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and caching mechanisms. However, some accessibility features could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical infrastructure supports a scalable SaaS offering but would benefit from enhanced security headers and clearer domain registration data.
Analyze Another Website