Is uspis.gov Safe? Security Analysis for United States Postal Inspection Service
Check if uspis.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) operates this website as a secure portal for authorized users to upload evidence related to postal investigations. The site is designed primarily for law enforcement and authorized personnel, providing a straightforward interface to enter an ID code and redirect to a secure evidence submission portal hosted on uspis.us.evidence.com. The website content is minimal but functional, focusing solely on the evidence upload process without additional informational or policy content. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and JavaScript with no advanced frameworks or CMS detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and no analytics or advertising scripts are present, indicating a focus on security and privacy. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is implied by the .gov domain, no explicit security headers or advanced protections are visible in the provided data. WHOIS information is incomplete, likely due to government domain privacy policies, but the domain's .gov TLD and content align with official government services, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site serves a critical government function but would benefit from enhanced security headers, privacy policies, and improved technical sophistication.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
USPIS is a federal government law enforcement agency responsible for postal inspection and investigation. This website supports their operational needs by providing a portal for evidence upload. The business model is service-oriented, targeting law enforcement and authorized users. The site does not engage in commercial activities or advertising. The lack of public contact information or policies suggests a controlled access environment. The partnership with uspis.us.evidence.com indicates reliance on a specialized third-party platform for evidence management. The USPIS brand is consistent and trustworthy due to its government affiliation and .gov domain. Growth indicators or revenue streams are not applicable given the government nature of the entity.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic security posture appropriate for a government evidence upload portal. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. The form requires an ID code and redirects users to a secure third-party portal, which is a positive security design. However, the absence of visible security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and lack of CSRF tokens or advanced form protections are weaknesses. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which may be acceptable given the limited public-facing content but could be improved for compliance. Incident response and security policy information are not provided. Overall, the site is functional but could enhance security controls and transparency.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
United States Postal Inspection Service
The website provides a portal for uploading evidence related to investigations handled by the United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS). It facilitates secure submission of video or other attachments via a redirected portal.
basic
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
basic
basic
poor
Security Assessment
- Form input requires ID code
- Redirects to a secure evidence portal
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a simple evidence upload portal for USPIS.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
Domain Registration Details
- •Privacy/proxy registration detected
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings