Skip to main content

Is utifar.it a Scam? Security Check Results - UTIFAR Reviews

U

Is utifar.it Safe? Security Analysis for UTIFAR

Check if utifar.it is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareItalymedium
jQueryBootstrap ItaliaGoogle Tag ManagerCustom JavaScript
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 6:42:34 PM
73
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

UTIFAR is a well-established Italian association for pharmacists, founded in 1957, providing consultancy, assistance, and high-quality training services including ECM courses. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting pharmacists and healthcare professionals in Italy. The digital infrastructure uses modern technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap Italia, with Google Tag Manager for analytics, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though security headers could be enhanced. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with clear contact information and social media presence. Overall, the website is trustworthy and serves its audience effectively.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrap ItaliaGoogle Tag ManagerCustom JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

UTIFAR operates as a non-profit association in the healthcare sector, focusing on pharmacists. Its market position is strong given its long history and specialized services including training, consulting, and publishing an official magazine. The business model centers on membership services and educational offerings. The association maintains partnerships such as with Upfarm, enhancing its service ecosystem. The website content and structure support its credibility and engagement with its target audience.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

u*****@utifar.it

Phone Numbers (1)

027*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or suspicious external links were found. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional headers and documented policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

UTIFAR

Description:

Scopri UTIFAR, associazione per farmacisti dal 1957. Consulenze, assistenza e formazione di alta qualità per i professionisti del settore.

Key Services:
Consulting for membersECM courses and trainingPublishing the official magazine 'Nuovo Collegamento'Online services for members
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrap ItaliaGoogle Tag ManagerCustom JavaScript
Frameworks:
Bootstrap Italia
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

90/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=16070400"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

80/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:aruba.it ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(228 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC ON
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:89.46.110.77
Name Servers:
dns.technorail.comDNS only
dns2.technorail.comDNS only
dns3.arubadns.netDNS only
dns4.arubadns.czDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.utifar.it
SOA:Serial: 2025051301, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:30ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:aruba.it ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a Joomla CMS platform with Bootstrap Italia framework and jQuery library, ensuring responsive design and accessibility. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, indicating a modern approach to data collection. The site loads with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. The technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website