Skip to main content

Is uzum.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Uzum Reviews

uzum.com favicon

Is uzum.com Safe? Security Analysis for Uzum

Check if uzum.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

E-commerceN/amedium
Cloudflare DNSVideoJS (video player)Custom fonts (TT Uzum)Noto Sans fonts
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 7:13:33 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Uzum is an established e-commerce platform founded in 2003, offering a broad range of products to general consumers. The website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity with a functional design, mobile optimization, and use of modern web technologies such as Cloudflare DNS and VideoJS for media content. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections, but could be improved by implementing DNSSEC and security headers. Overall, the site is accessible and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

Cloudflare DNSVideoJS (video player)Custom fonts (TT Uzum)Noto Sans fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the e-commerce sector targeting general consumers with an online marketplace model. The domain age of over 20 years supports a credible market presence. The lack of explicit contact information and policy documents in the analyzed content suggests potential gaps in customer engagement and regulatory compliance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries in the provided data. The platform appears to focus on retail sales without visible affiliate or advertising networks. Growth potential could be enhanced by improving transparency and compliance documentation.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS, which are positive security indicators. Domain status flags prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions, enhancing domain security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which may expose the business to compliance risks under GDPR or similar regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Uzum

Description:

Uzum is an e-commerce platform offering a wide range of products to consumers. The website appears to be a retail marketplace targeting general consumers.

Key Services:
Online retail marketplaceProduct sales
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Cloudflare DNSVideoJS (video player)Custom fonts (TT Uzum)Noto Sans fonts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a:google.com include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.amocrmmail.com include:spf.unisender.com ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:uzum.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/28/2025 (55 days)
SANs:uzum.com, *.uzum.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
22 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(229 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.66.158.145, 104.20.26.166
AAAA Records:2606:4700:10::ac42:9e91, 2606:4700:10::6814:1aa6
Name Servers:
may.ns.cloudflare.com
remy.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2378850042, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:73ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a:google.com include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.amocrmmail.com include:spf.unisender.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a custom font family 'TT Uzum' and Noto Sans fonts, indicating attention to branding and multilingual support. VideoJS is used for video playback, suggesting multimedia content integration. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and uses Cloudflare for DNS, which is a reliable hosting and DNS provider combination. The site appears to be mobile optimized and has a good design quality. However, no CMS or major frameworks were explicitly detected in the provided HTML snippet. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing assets and implementing caching strategies. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal based on meta tags and structured data absence.
Analyze Another Website