Skip to main content

Is valmiralingerie.com a Scam? Security Check Results - VALMIR.A Reviews

valmiralingerie.com favicon

Is valmiralingerie.com Safe? Security Analysis for VALMIR.A

Check if valmiralingerie.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
jQueryGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:47:34 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Valmir.A is a small Latvian lingerie retailer and manufacturer specializing in elegant and comfortable lingerie products including bodysuits, bras, and nightwear. The company targets adult women seeking quality lingerie with a focus on natural cotton models and plus sizes. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and product presentation, supporting e-commerce and direct sales. Technically, the site uses jQuery and Google Analytics, hosted under a known registrar, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for compliance and security improvements. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the retail sector focusing on lingerie and nightwear, with a niche market position emphasizing comfort and natural materials. The business model combines manufacturing and e-commerce sales, targeting mature adult women. The website presence and social media links indicate active marketing efforts. The domain age and registration data align with a small business established in 2019. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The company maintains direct contact channels and physical presence in Latvia, supporting credibility. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and compliance improvements.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@valmiralingerie.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712569****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible blocking or WAF mechanisms. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The contact form includes a CAPTCHA image but the send button is disabled by default, suggesting some anti-spam measures. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and compliance frameworks.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

VALMIR.A

Description:

Valmir.A is a lingerie retailer and manufacturer based in Liepāja, Latvia, offering a range of lingerie products including bodysuits, bras, nightwear, and plus sizes. The website showcases product categories and models with images and links.

Key Services:
Lingerie product salesCustom lingerie manufacturing
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by base href and form action URLs

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'default' uses 1008-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.205 ip4:85.31.97.30 a mx ip4:91.203.68.160/27 ip4:91.203.68.192/28 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1008-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(305 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.68.205
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lv
ns2.nano.lv
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073006, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:293ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.205 ip4:85.31.97.30 a mx ip4:91.203.68.160/27 ip4:91.203.68.192/28 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional jQuery-based front-end with custom scripts and Google Analytics for tracking. The HTML is valid with meta tags but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data for enhanced SEO. The site is hosted under a registrar known for domain registration but no CMS or advanced platform detected. Performance is moderate with some legacy scripts and no modern frameworks. Mobile optimization is basic with no explicit responsive meta tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal. There is opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve SEO with structured data, and enhance performance and security.
Analyze Another Website