Skip to main content

Is valoraytech.com a Scam? Security Check Results - valoraytech.com Reviews

V

Is valoraytech.com Safe? Security Analysis for valoraytech.com

Check if valoraytech.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
React
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 3:58:33 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at valoraytech.com/lander is a minimal landing or parking page with very limited content. It appears to be a placeholder or temporary page with no visible business information, contact details, or policies. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and is approximately two years old, which is consistent with a new or small business. The technical infrastructure includes React-based static content and external scripts from wsimg.com and Google Adsense, indicating some use of modern web technologies but minimal development effort. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS information, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. There are no forms or data collection mechanisms, reducing immediate risk but also indicating low business maturity. Overall, the site lacks trust signals and business credibility, limiting its usefulness for customers or partners.

Detected Technologies

React

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the minimal content and lack of business information, it is not possible to determine the company's market position, business model, or target audience. The domain age and registrar information suggest a legitimate registration but no further business intelligence can be extracted. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators. The site likely serves as a placeholder or parking page rather than an active business portal.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is currently weak. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The absence of contact or incident response information further reduces the site's security maturity. No vulnerabilities are directly visible due to the minimal content, but the lack of basic security controls is a concern.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all traffic.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
React
Platforms:
Parking Lander
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a minimal parking or landing page with no substantive content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(31 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.33.130.190, 15.197.148.33
Name Servers:
ns75.domaincontrol.com
ns76.domaincontrol.com
SOA:Serial: 2023092000, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:70ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses React for rendering and loads scripts and styles from wsimg.com, indicating use of a parking or landing page platform. The domain is hosted via GoDaddy DNS servers. Performance is likely moderate given minimal content, but SEO and accessibility are poor due to lack of metadata and content. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected beyond React. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking beyond Google Adsense ads. Overall, the technical implementation is basic and requires significant enhancement for a production business site.
Analyze Another Website