Skip to main content

Is valter.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - valter.lv Reviews

V

Is valter.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if valter.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA v2
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:27:46 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website valter.lv currently serves a security CAPTCHA challenge page powered by BitNinja, designed to block automated or malicious traffic. No business or product information is accessible without passing the CAPTCHA, indicating the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security service. The page uses outdated CMS meta tags referencing Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are no longer supported and pose potential security risks if still in use. The technical infrastructure includes Google reCAPTCHA v2 and Google Analytics for bot mitigation and user tracking. However, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or business information is available on the page. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible for normal browsing and lacks transparency and business credibility.

Detected Technologies

Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA v2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the security challenge page, no direct business information, market positioning, or services are disclosed. The domain appears to be protected by BitNinja security services, suggesting a focus on security or risk mitigation. No partner or subsidiary domains are identified. The lack of contact details, privacy policies, or certifications reduces business credibility and trust. The presence of outdated CMS references may indicate legacy infrastructure or lack of maintenance. No revenue streams or customer segments can be inferred from the available data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs a BitNinja CAPTCHA challenge to prevent automated access, indicating a proactive security posture against bots and malicious traffic. Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 further supports bot mitigation efforts. However, the presence of outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) in meta tags is a significant security concern, as these versions are vulnerable and unsupported. No security headers are detected in the HTML content, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate due to active bot protection but weakened by legacy software indications and lack of transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Update all CMS platforms to current supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

The website content is a security CAPTCHA challenge page served by BitNinja, blocking access until CAPTCHA is solved.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

This page is a security CAPTCHA challenge page designed to block automated or malicious traffic. It does not provide business or product information.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA v2
Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Security challenge page to block suspicious IPs

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently blocked by a BitNinja CAPTCHA security page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net ip4:213.227.132.36 +a +mx ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 76 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:95.211.208.241
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: valter.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025071701, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:412ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net ip4:213.227.132.36 +a +mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS platforms as indicated by meta tags (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5), which are outdated and pose security risks. The page is a minimal security challenge interface with embedded Google reCAPTCHA v2 and Google Analytics scripts for bot detection and user tracking. The HTML is valid but basic, with inline CSS styles and no advanced frameworks detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meaningful content and meta tags beyond the security challenge context. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not discernible from the HTML content. The site is currently inaccessible for normal browsing due to the security challenge.
Analyze Another Website