Skip to main content

Is vanityfair.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Vanity Fair Reviews

vanityfair.com favicon

Is vanityfair.com Safe? Security Analysis for Vanity Fair

Check if vanityfair.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/aenterprise
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerFides consent managementDoubleClick for PublishersJSON-LD structured data
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 2:56:40 AM
70
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Vanity Fair is a globally recognized media brand specializing in entertainment, politics, fashion, and celebrity news. Owned by Condé Nast, it operates as an enterprise-level media publisher with a strong digital presence. The website offers rich editorial content, video features, and commentary targeting a general audience interested in culture and lifestyle. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, and a consent management platform to comply with privacy regulations. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, and consent mechanisms are in place, but explicit security headers and incident response information are not publicly visible. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which is unusual but likely due to privacy or registry technicalities. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerFides consent managementDoubleClick for PublishersJSON-LD structured data

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Vanity Fair holds a strong market position as a premium media outlet under Condé Nast, leveraging its brand equity and sister publications for cross-promotion. Its business model centers on advertising revenue supported by high-quality editorial content. The target audience is broad, encompassing readers interested in culture, fashion, and politics. The presence of multiple related domains from Condé Nast indicates a robust partnership ecosystem. The site’s use of advanced marketing and analytics tools suggests a mature digital strategy focused on user engagement and monetization. Growth indicators include active content updates and integration with social media platforms.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@newyorker.com

Phone Numbers (1)

180*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with mandatory HTTPS and a consent management system to handle user privacy preferences. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security score. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts is a gap in transparency and readiness. The domain’s WHOIS information is missing, which could be a concern but is mitigated by the brand’s reputation. Recommendations include enhancing HTTP security headers and publishing clear security and incident response information.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Vanity Fair

Description:

Entertainment, TV, politics, celebrity, fashion, and beauty news and commentary.

Key Services:
news articlescelebrity coveragefashion and beauty commentaryvideo content
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerFides consent managementDoubleClick for PublishersJSON-LD structured data
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (implied via GTM)
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
DoubleClick
Marketing Tools:
Martech by Condé Nast
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional media publication with rich content and strong brand presence.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

73/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.vanityfair.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1408-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:a6816915@inbox.ondmarc.com
Forensic Reports:a6816915@inbox.ondmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

90/100
Score

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:vanityfair.com
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Valid Until:3/13/2026 (189 days)
SANs:vanityfair.com, *.vanityfair.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
29 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(549 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.128.239, 151.101.192.239, 151.101.64.239, 151.101.0.239
Name Servers:
ns-1116.awsdns-11.org
ns-1935.awsdns-49.co.uk
ns-28.awsdns-03.com
ns-836.awsdns-40.net
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:30ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.vanityfair.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with integration of Google Tag Manager and DoubleClick for advertising and analytics. Consent management is handled via the Fides platform, indicating compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The site loads asynchronously loaded scripts and fonts, optimizing performance. While the CMS is not explicitly identified, the presence of Condé Nast digital services suggests a proprietary or customized platform. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website