Skip to main content

Is veluxfoundations.dk a Scam? Security Check Results - Velux Foundations Reviews

veluxfoundations.dk favicon

Is veluxfoundations.dk Safe? Security Analysis for Velux Foundations

Check if veluxfoundations.dk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitDenmarkmedium
Drupal 10SVG graphicsJavaScript
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 9:02:45 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Velux Foundations is a well-established Danish non-profit organization focused on philanthropic activities, operating since 2009. The website serves as a portal to two foundation groups, Villum Fonden and Velux Fonden, indicating a clear mission in grant-making and charitable support. The site is built on Drupal 10, featuring modern web technologies such as SVG graphics and JavaScript for analytics. The technical infrastructure is moderate in performance and well-optimized for mobile devices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage implied, but lacks explicit security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly present, indicating room for compliance improvement. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

Drupal 10SVG graphicsJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Velux Foundations website positions itself as a key player in the Danish philanthropic sector, leveraging its long domain history and consistent branding to build trust. Its business model centers on non-profit grant funding, targeting general public and partners interested in foundation activities. The absence of direct contact information on the main page suggests a controlled communication approach, possibly directing users to specific foundation sub-sites. The use of minimal external domains and a reputable registrar supports operational stability. The partnership with veluxfonden.dk is evident, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The website’s content quality and design reflect a medium-sized organization with a focused mission and moderate digital maturity.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communication, but the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No forms or input fields were detected, minimizing attack surface from injection or data leakage vulnerabilities. The absence of explicit privacy and security policies may expose compliance risks under GDPR. Analytics usage is limited to Plausible, a privacy-friendly service, which reduces tracking risks. Incident response and data protection officer contacts are not found, indicating potential gaps in security governance. Overall, the site is secure for informational purposes but should enhance security controls and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Velux Foundations

Description:

Velux Foundations is a non-profit organization associated with the Velux group, focusing on philanthropic activities. The website provides access to two foundations: Villum Fonden and Velux Fonden, indicating a focus on grant-making or foundation activities.

Key Services:
Grant fundingPhilanthropic support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Drupal 10SVG graphicsJavaScript
Frameworks:
Drupal
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Plausible
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Plausible
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf50260.spfprotect.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:655f068552581@dmarc.centerasecurity.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc@velux.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 58 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

50/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 29 days

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(11 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:82.103.129.185
Name Servers:
dns1.cscdns.netDNS only
dns2.cscdns.netDNS only
veluxfoundations.dkWHOIS only
MX Records:
10: velux.mail.protection.outlook.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and secure CMS platform, indicating up-to-date infrastructure. The use of SVG logos and minimal external scripts contributes to efficient page loading and good mobile optimization. Analytics are handled by Plausible, a lightweight and privacy-conscious service. However, the lack of visible security headers and DNSSEC suggests technical debt in security hardening. The site’s performance is moderate, with room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. No forms or interactive elements were detected, reducing complexity but also limiting user engagement. Overall, the technical setup is stable but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website