Skip to main content

Is velvemst.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - velvemst.lv Reviews

V

Is velvemst.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if velvemst.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA v2BitNinja security service
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:42:17 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website velvemst.lv currently serves as a security challenge page implemented by BitNinja, requiring visitors to complete a CAPTCHA to proceed. This indicates the domain or IP has been flagged for suspicious activity or abuse, and the site is actively protecting itself from automated or malicious traffic. There is no business or commercial content presented, and no company information is available on the page. The site uses outdated CMS meta tags (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5), which may be remnants or placeholders but represent potential security risks if actually in use. Technically, the site integrates Google reCAPTCHA v2 and Google Analytics for bot mitigation and tracking, respectively. The page is basic in design and functionality, with minimal content and limited SEO or accessibility features. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information is provided. From a security perspective, the site benefits from BitNinja's greylist IP blocking and delisting mechanism, which is a positive control against abuse. However, the lack of visible security headers and the use of outdated CMS versions are concerns. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits prevents a full legitimacy assessment of the domain registration. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible for normal browsing without passing the CAPTCHA challenge, limiting content and business analysis. The security posture is moderate due to active bot mitigation but lacks comprehensive security best practices and transparency. Strategic recommendations include updating CMS software, implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and improving accessibility and SEO.

Detected Technologies

Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA v2BitNinja security service

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the site content as it functions solely as a security challenge page. There is no indication of market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments. The presence of BitNinja security services suggests the domain is protected against abuse but does not imply a commercial business model or partnerships. No contact or company information is available to analyze partnerships or ecosystem.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is characterized by the use of BitNinja's greylist IP blocking and CAPTCHA challenge to prevent automated or malicious access. This is a strong indication of proactive bot mitigation. However, the site lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended for enhanced protection. The outdated CMS versions indicated in meta tags pose potential vulnerabilities if actually deployed. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap. Incident response and security policy information are absent, limiting transparency. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate security controls but requires improvements to align with best practices and compliance standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Update the CMS software to supported, secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

The website content is a security challenge page served by BitNinja, requiring CAPTCHA validation to proceed, indicating a WAF or security filtering mechanism is active.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

This website is a security challenge page designed to block or filter visitors by requiring CAPTCHA validation to continue browsing. It is not a business or commercial site presenting products or services.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA v2BitNinja security service
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Security challenge page to block suspicious IPs
  • BitNinja greylist IP blocking and delisting mechanism

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is not a typical business or content site but a security CAPTCHA challenge page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 58 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:95.211.208.241
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: velvemst-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025070300, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:97ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS meta tags indicating Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated and unsupported, posing security risks if in use. The integration of Google reCAPTCHA v2 and Google Analytics scripts is evident, supporting bot mitigation and analytics tracking. The page is minimalistic, serving as a security challenge rather than a content-rich site. Performance is moderate given the simple content, but SEO and accessibility are poor due to lack of meta tags and structured data. No hosting provider information is discernible. The site is mobile basic responsive but lacks advanced features or modern frameworks. Technical debt is implied by outdated CMS references and missing security headers.
Analyze Another Website