Skip to main content

Is veno.finance a Scam? Security Check Results - Veno Finance Reviews

V

Is veno.finance Safe? Security Analysis for Veno Finance

Check if veno.finance is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
ReactNext.jsChakra UISwiper.js
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:18:58 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Security scan incomplete. 3 out of 9 security checks failed to complete. The website may be inaccessible or protected by security measures. Please retry the scan or verify the website is accessible.

AI Summary

Veno Finance is a DeFi platform specializing in liquid staking services primarily for CRO, ATOM, ETH, and TIA tokens. It offers users the ability to stake tokens and receive liquid tokens in return, which can be used across partner protocols to earn additional rewards. The platform also features its own protocol token, VNO, which provides utility, rewards, liquidity incentives, and alignment benefits. The website presents a professional and modern interface, leveraging technologies such as React, Next.js, and Chakra UI, and integrates with multiple blockchain ecosystems and partners. Security-wise, Veno Finance demonstrates a strong posture with HTTPS enforcement and a publicly available audit report by Slowmist, though it lacks some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common in the crypto space, but limits transparency. Overall, the platform appears legitimate and well-positioned within the niche DeFi staking market.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsChakra UISwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Veno Finance targets crypto investors and DeFi users seeking liquid staking solutions with enhanced liquidity and rewards. Its business model revolves around staking services, protocol token incentives, and partnerships with other DeFi protocols to boost user rewards. The platform's market position is niche but supported by a growing ecosystem of partners such as Tectonic, Ferro, and SyncSwap. Revenue streams likely include staking fees and tokenomics benefits from VNO. The company maintains active social media channels and provides audit transparency, enhancing trust. However, the lack of explicit contact information and privacy-protected WHOIS data suggest a focus on privacy and security typical in crypto projects.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of Veno Finance is moderate to strong. The platform uses HTTPS exclusively and links to a Slowmist audit report, indicating attention to security. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of a cookie consent mechanism are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve security readiness and transparency. Overall, the platform demonstrates good security hygiene but could benefit from formalizing some policies and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Veno Finance

Description:

Stake CRO on Veno Finance and earn the highest APY with never ending liquidity and additional DeFi rewards.

Key Services:
Liquid staking of CRO, ATOM, ETH, TIAProtocol token VNO with utility and rewardsPartnership integrations for additional rewards
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsChakra UISwiper.js
Frameworks:
Next.jsChakra UI
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Audit report linked

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:veno.finance@rua.dmarcdkim.io
Forensic Reports:veno.finance@ruf.dmarcdkim.io

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 31 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:veno.finance
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/7/2025 (31 days)
SANs:veno.finance, *.veno.finance

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.16.1, 104.21.32.1, 104.21.48.1, 104.21.64.1, 104.21.80.1, 104.21.96.1, 104.21.112.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:1001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:7001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001
Name Servers:
emma.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
otto.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2380906374, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:56ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with Chakra UI for styling and Swiper.js for interactive components. The site is mobile optimized and shows good SEO practices with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and prefetching. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. The technical infrastructure appears well-maintained with no visible technical debt or deprecated libraries. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers to further strengthen the platform's technical posture.
Analyze Another Website