Skip to main content

Is ventic.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - ventic.cz Reviews

V

Is ventic.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Security Verification

Check if ventic.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 5:07:08 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website ventic.cz currently serves a security verification page that employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect against automated bots. This indicates a protective security posture but also blocks access to the actual website content, limiting the ability to analyze business details or user-facing information. The domain is registered in 2021 with a Czech registrar and uses Czech name servers, consistent with the domain's country code. The technical infrastructure includes modern frontend frameworks like Bootstrap and Google reCAPTCHA, but lacks visible security headers or privacy policies on the landing page. Overall, the site appears to be in an early or protected stage with minimal public content available. The security posture shows strengths in bot mitigation but lacks transparency in privacy and contact information, which impacts trust and compliance assessments.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the security verification page blocking content, no direct business information, contact details, or service descriptions are available. The domain age and registration data suggest a small Czech-based entity likely in early development or employing strict access controls. No partnerships, certifications, or marketing tools are evident. The business model and market positioning cannot be determined from the accessible data. The lack of visible policies and contact information limits credibility and user trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 as a bot mitigation mechanism, indicating an awareness of automated threats. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No information about SSL/TLS configuration is available from the HTML content, though the domain uses HTTPS as implied by the URL. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, suggests compliance gaps. The security verification page effectively blocks automated access but also restricts legitimate user access and analysis.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publicly display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page is a security verification challenge with invisible Google reCAPTCHA and loading spinner, indicating bot protection or WAF challenge.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • Invisible reCAPTCHA integration

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a security verification page using Google reCAPTCHA v3.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1312-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 51 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.ventic.cz
Issuer:R11
Valid Until:9/22/2025 (51 days)
SANs:*.ventic.cz, ventic.cz

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)

DNS Records

A Records:185.151.30.220
AAAA Records:2a07:7800::220
Name Servers:
ns1.webkitty.eu
ns2.webkitty.eu
ns3.webkitty.eu
ns4.webkitty.eu
MX Records:
10: mx.stackmail.com
SOA:Serial: 1725208416, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:154ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and layout and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 for invisible bot protection. External resources are loaded from reputable CDNs and Google domains, indicating a modern and reliable tech stack. The page is mobile responsive and uses basic accessibility features. However, the site lacks SEO optimization and visible metadata beyond the title. The security verification page limits content access, which impacts performance and user experience. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website