Skip to main content

Is vergissmeinnicht.at a Scam? Security Check Results - vergissmeinnicht.at Reviews

vergissmeinnicht.at favicon

Is vergissmeinnicht.at Safe? Security Analysis for Die Initiative für das gute Testament in Österreich: Vergiss mein nicht

Check if vergissmeinnicht.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitAustriasmall
WordPressElementorRank Math PROGoogle Fonts (Inter)Swiper.js
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 12:06:41 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website 'Vergiss mein nicht' is an Austrian initiative focused on promoting good testament practices. It serves as an informational platform targeting the general Austrian public interested in legal testament matters. The site is built on WordPress using Elementor and Rank Math PRO, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with SEO considerations. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers suggests gaps in compliance and security posture. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the content is safe for general audiences. The overall risk is moderate, with recommendations to improve privacy compliance, security headers, and contact transparency to enhance trust and legal compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorRank Math PROGoogle Fonts (Inter)Swiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The initiative appears to be a small-scale, niche non-profit focused on testament education in Austria. Its business model is informational, likely relying on awareness and educational outreach rather than commercial transactions. The website's market position is specialized, targeting individuals seeking testament guidance. The use of Rank Math PRO suggests some investment in SEO to reach its audience. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The lack of explicit business registration or contact details limits the assessment of credibility and growth potential.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@vergissmeinnicht.at

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. There is no evidence of security headers, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The SSL/TLS configuration is unknown due to lack of data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No forms or data collection mechanisms were identified, reducing immediate data exposure risks but also limiting user engagement. To improve, the site should implement standard security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and provide clear contact channels for security incidents.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Website appears to be an initiative focused on promoting good testament practices in Austria. It is likely a non-profit or informational platform aimed at educating or assisting individuals with testament matters.

Key Services:
Information about testamentEducational contentPossibly brochure distribution
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorRank Math PROGoogle Fonts (Inter)Swiper.js
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Rank Math PRO
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

43/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:remote.fundraising.at include:spf.marmara.at include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:aspmx.pardot.com -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 54 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:104.17.15.101
Name Servers:
ns.internet1.deDNS only
ns2.internet1.deDNS only
ns3.internet1.deDNS only
MX Records:
7: vergissmeinnicht-at.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025042905, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:163ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:remote.fundraising.at include:spf.marmara.at include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:aspmx.pardot.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern CMS (WordPress) with Elementor page builder and Rank Math PRO for SEO optimization. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and Swiper.js is used for interactive elements. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design. Performance is moderate, with some preloading of images and fonts. Accessibility features are basic but present. No advanced security or performance optimization plugins were detected. Hosting provider and SSL details are not available from the provided data.
Analyze Another Website