Skip to main content

Is versuslogistics.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Versus Logistics SIA Reviews

versuslogistics.lv favicon

Is versuslogistics.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Versus Logistics SIA

Check if versuslogistics.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
WordPressPHPjQuerySlider RevolutionElementor+3 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:52:05 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Versus Logistics SIA is a Latvian-based logistics company specializing in cargo transportation, warehousing, and supply chain planning services. The company presents itself as a reliable partner with over ten years of experience, targeting businesses requiring freight and logistics solutions. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Slider Revolution, indicating a modern but standard CMS infrastructure. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation and mobile optimization, though some minor technical issues such as visible debug notices exist. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and reCAPTCHA used on forms, but lacks advanced security headers and visible incident response policies. Privacy compliance is indicated by a privacy policy page and GDPR consent in the contact form, but no cookie consent banner is present. Overall, the site is trustworthy and suitable for its business purpose, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting full domain trust assessment.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQuerySlider RevolutionElementorContact Form 7Google FontsreCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the transportation sector, offering key services including supply chain planning, sea transportation, warehouse services, and customs brokerage. The business model is service-oriented, targeting other businesses needing logistics support. The website content and testimonials suggest a small but established company with a focus on quality and reliability. Social media links point to the theme developer rather than the company, indicating limited social media presence. No certifications or security policies are publicly displayed, which could be an area for improvement to enhance credibility. The company appears to have a focused market position in Latvia with potential for growth in regional logistics services.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@versuslogistics.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

+3716765****
+3712028****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and includes Google reCAPTCHA on its contact form, which are positive security measures. However, visible WordPress debug notices in the HTML source indicate a misconfiguration that could expose internal information. No advanced security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected, and no security or incident response policies are published. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by removing debug information, implementing security headers, and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Remove WordPress debug notices and ensure production environment is properly configured.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Versus Logistics SIA

Description:

Versus Logistics SIA is a trustworthy and dynamic logistics company offering cargo transportation and warehousing services with over ten years of experience.

Key Services:
Supply Chain PlanningSea TransportationWarehouse ServicesCustoms Brokerage
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQuerySlider RevolutionElementorContact Form 7Google FontsreCAPTCHA
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing Tools:
ElementorSlider Revolution
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based logistics company site with professional design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx ip4:185.56.87.1 include:_spf.mailspamprotection.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:versuslogistics@inboxeen.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 61 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:versuslogistics.lv
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/30/2025 (61 days)
SANs:versuslogistics.lv, *.versuslogistics.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.32.1, 104.21.48.1, 104.21.112.1, 104.21.80.1, 104.21.96.1, 104.21.16.1, 104.21.64.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:7001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:1001
Name Servers:
becky.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
lynn.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: ams15.siteground.eu
SOA:Serial: 2378720691, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:74ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx ip4:185.56.87.1 include:_spf.mailspamprotection.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Elementor 3.30.2 and Slider Revolution 6.7.2, indicating use of popular and modern web technologies. It uses Google Fonts and jQuery libraries. The site loads asynchronously some scripts like reCAPTCHA. The presence of debug notices suggests some technical debt or misconfiguration. Performance appears moderate with some large images and slider content. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No advanced hosting or CDN information was found in the HTML source.
Analyze Another Website