Skip to main content

Is vertetaji.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Latvijas Īpašumu Vērtētāju asociācija Reviews

vertetaji.lv favicon

Is vertetaji.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Latvijas Īpašumu Vērtētāju asociācija

Check if vertetaji.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
jQuery Mousewheel 3.1.13FontAwesome 5.0.13
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:22:48 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Latvijas Īpašumu Vērtētāju asociācija (LĪVA) is a Latvian non-profit association established in 1995, focused on developing and maintaining valuation standards and education for property valuers. The organization serves a specialized audience of valuation professionals and related companies, providing certification services and organizing industry events. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and multilingual support. Technically, the site uses common libraries such as jQuery Mousewheel and FontAwesome, with a Bootstrap-based responsive design. However, there is no evidence of advanced CMS or analytics tools. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers or policies, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

jQuery Mousewheel 3.1.13FontAwesome 5.0.13

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

LĪVA holds a strong position in the Latvian real estate valuation sector as a recognized association with international certifications like REV and REV-BV. Its business model centers on member services, certification, and standardization rather than commercial sales. The organization maintains a modest size with 115 members and 23 associated companies. The website supports its market presence with event announcements and structured information. Lack of visible analytics or marketing tools suggests a focus on professional community engagement rather than broad consumer marketing. The association’s clear registration and contact details enhance credibility, though the absence of privacy and cookie policies may affect compliance perception.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@vertetaji.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712654****
+3716728****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

Latvijas Īpašumu Vērtētāju asociācija

Registration Number:

40008010952

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the HTML content. There is no published privacy or cookie policy, nor incident response or security contact information. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were identified in the source. The absence of WHOIS data reduces the ability to fully assess domain legitimacy. Overall, the site meets minimal security expectations for an informational association website but should enhance transparency and implement security best practices such as CSP, HSTS, and privacy disclosures to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Latvijas Īpašumu Vērtētāju asociācija

Description:

Latvijas Īpašumu Vērtētāju asociācija (LĪVA) is a public organization founded on January 13, 1995, with registration number LV 40008010952. Its main task is to develop a valuation system aligned with international valuation standards and to establish an education system for valuers. It currently has 115 members and 23 associated companies related to property valuation.

Key Services:
Valuation standardizationValuer education and certificationCompetence supervisionOrganizing events and conferences
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery Mousewheel 3.1.13FontAwesome 5.0.13
Frameworks:
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Cloudflare

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@vertetaji.lv
Forensic Reports:dmarc@vertetaji

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:178.16.16.92
Name Servers:
ns1.serveris.lvDNS only
ns2.serveris.lvDNS only
ns3.serveris.lvDNS only
MX Records:
20: vertetaji-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2022022406, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:335ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with jQuery Mousewheel and FontAwesome for UI elements, and Bootstrap classes indicating a responsive layout. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts or trackers. Mobile optimization is good with responsive navigation and language selection. SEO is basic with minimal meta description and no Open Graph or structured data found. Accessibility features are limited but navigation is clear. The site could benefit from modern SEO enhancements and accessibility improvements to broaden reach and usability.
Analyze Another Website