Skip to main content

Is vet33.it a Scam? Security Check Results - EDRA LSWR Reviews

vet33.it favicon

Is vet33.it Safe? Security Analysis for EDRA LSWR

Check if vet33.it is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareItalymedium
jQuery 1.11.3Bootstrap CSSSlick CarouselGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Publisher Tags (GPT)+4 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 2:16:33 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Vet33 is a professional veterinary news and education platform operated by EDRA LSWR, targeting veterinary professionals in Italy. The website offers clinical insights, research updates, professional training, event coverage, and industry news. It maintains a consistent brand presence and is well-positioned in the veterinary media sector. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Tag Manager, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers, though the use of an outdated jQuery version presents a potential risk. Privacy compliance is strong, featuring GDPR-compliant policies and consent management via Usercentrics. No contact emails or phone numbers are directly visible, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for its intended audience.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.11.3Bootstrap CSSSlick CarouselGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Publisher Tags (GPT)Usercentrics Consent ManagementFilePond (file upload)Select2Flexslider

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Vet33 operates as a specialized media outlet within the veterinary healthcare sector, providing valuable content and professional development resources. Its business model revolves around content publishing, advertising via Google DFP, and partnerships with related healthcare and veterinary sites. The platform targets veterinarians and related professionals, leveraging its parent company EDRA LSWR's reputation. The presence of multiple partner domains indicates a strong ecosystem and collaborative approach. The site’s content and structure support ongoing engagement with its audience, positioning it as a key information source in the Italian veterinary market.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers. The integration of Usercentrics for cookie consent shows attention to privacy regulations. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version (1.11.3) is a notable vulnerability that could expose the site to known exploits. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure mechanism is a gap in responsible security practices. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved by updating libraries and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade jQuery to the latest secure version to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

EDRA LSWR

Description:

Veterinaria33 - EDRA LSWR dedica al mondo della veterinaria approfondimenti di clinica e ricerca, formazione, attualità professionale e news quotidiane

Key Services:
Veterinary news and articlesProfessional training and coursesEvent coverageIndustry special reportsInterviews with experts
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.11.3Bootstrap CSSSlick CarouselGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Publisher Tags (GPT)Usercentrics Consent ManagementFilePond (file upload)Select2Flexslider
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and GPT with consent management
  • Cookie consent via Usercentrics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google DoubleClick for Publishers (DFP)
Tracking Pixels:
Google Publisher Tags
Marketing Tools:
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional veterinary news and education platform operated by EDRA LSWR.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.dpsw.it -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 62 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

42 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(143 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC ON
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:194.79.56.177
Name Servers:
ns.abdns.bizDNS only
ns.abdns.euDNS only
ns.abdns.infoDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.dpsw.it
SOA:Serial: 2022111602, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:305ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.dpsw.it -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Slick Carousel for interactive sliders. Google Tag Manager and Google Publisher Tags are used for analytics and advertising management. Usercentrics provides GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The site appears to be custom-built or uses a proprietary CMS, as no common CMS signatures were detected. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization especially on mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO is well addressed through meta tags and structured navigation. The outdated jQuery version is a technical debt that should be addressed to maintain security and compatibility.
Analyze Another Website