Skip to main content

Is veteranscrisisline.net a Scam? Security Check Results - U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Reviews

veteranscrisisline.net favicon

Is veteranscrisisline.net Safe? Security Analysis for U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Check if veteranscrisisline.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Stateslarge
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelBing AdsYouTube API+3 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 2:26:00 PM
77
Security Score
LOW RISK

AI Summary

The Veterans Crisis Line website provides critical 24/7 confidential crisis support services for Veterans, service members, National Guard and Reserve members, and their families. It offers multiple contact methods including phone, chat, and text, emphasizing accessibility and confidentiality. The site is clearly branded as part of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, positioning it as an authoritative government resource in the mental health and crisis support sector. The business model is government-funded and focused on public service rather than commercial revenue generation. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Bing Ads for analytics and marketing purposes. It uses responsive design techniques and accessibility features to ensure a good user experience across devices. The site loads with moderate performance and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. However, explicit cookie consent mechanisms are absent, which could be improved for privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and links to privacy and vulnerability disclosure policies, indicating a mature security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incident response contact information suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which is unusual but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy given the strong branding and official VA links. Overall, the website is a trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained government resource with strong content quality and user experience. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance with cookie consent, publishing incident response contacts, and adding security headers to further harden the site against threats.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelBing AdsYouTube APIjQueryHTML5shivTypekit Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Veterans Crisis Line operates as a government essential service under the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, targeting Veterans and their support networks. Its market position is unique as the official crisis support line for Veterans, providing critical mental health assistance. The business model is non-commercial, funded by government resources, focusing on public health and safety. The site demonstrates strong partnership with the VA main domain and leverages a network of resources to support its audience. Growth indicators include integration with the national 988 dialing code and expansion of chat and text services. The partnership ecosystem includes government agencies and mental health organizations. The website's operations reflect a mature, stable presence with a focus on accessibility and trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (6)

838***
+1844702****
+1844702****
+1855422****
+1888482****
+1 more numbers found

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and links to privacy and vulnerability disclosure policies. No exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. Incident response information is not publicly available, which could hinder rapid vulnerability reporting. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts introduces moderate privacy risks, though these are common in government websites for analytics. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced header policies and transparent incident response channels to improve compliance and resilience.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement explicit cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Description:

Provides 24/7 confidential crisis support for Veterans and their loved ones, including call, chat, and text services.

Key Services:
24/7 crisis support via phone, chat, and textResource connection and referralSupport for Veterans and their families
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelBing AdsYouTube APIjQueryHTML5shivTypekit Fonts
Frameworks:
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes)Google Maps API
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Privacy policy and vulnerability disclosure linked
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft Clarity
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Bing AdsAdsWizz
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelSpotify PixelMicrosoft Clarity
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=2592000"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

20/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:reports@dmarc.cyber.dhs.gov

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.veteranscrisisline.net
Issuer:DigiCert TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid Until:4/14/2026 (221 days)
SANs:www.veteranscrisisline.net

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:3.164.68.38, 3.164.68.104, 3.164.68.9, 3.164.68.48
Name Servers:
ns-1093.awsdns-08.orgDNS only
ns-1676.awsdns-17.co.ukDNS only
ns-188.awsdns-23.comDNS only
ns-950.awsdns-54.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: veteranscrisisline-net.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:26ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern and robust technical infrastructure with Google Tag Manager, analytics, and multiple advertising/tracking pixels integrated. It employs responsive CSS stylesheets for different screen sizes and uses Typekit for fonts. The presence of jQuery and Bootstrap-like classes suggests a mature front-end framework. Google Maps API is included, likely for resource location services. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts to optimize speed. Accessibility features such as skip navigation links and ARIA attributes are present, enhancing usability. The site does not appear to use a traditional CMS or reveals hosting provider details. Technical debt appears low with opportunities to improve security headers and privacy compliance.
Analyze Another Website