Skip to main content

Is vgprojekti.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - vides un ģeo projekti Reviews

V

Is vgprojekti.lv Safe? Security Analysis for vides un ģeo projekti

Check if vgprojekti.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
jQuery 3.2.1jQuery LazyLoad 1.9.7Picturefill 1.8.11Voog CMS
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:42:23 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website 'vgprojekti.lv' represents a small Latvian company specializing in geotechnical investigation, geological research, and groundwater monitoring services. The business appears to target local or regional clients in the environmental and engineering sectors. The site content is minimal but consistent with the company's service offerings and branding. Contact information is limited but clearly presented in the footer. The website is built on the Voog CMS platform, utilizing common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Picturefill for responsive images. The technical infrastructure is basic but functional, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled; however, the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration transparency. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and suitable for its business purpose but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.2.1jQuery LazyLoad 1.9.7Picturefill 1.8.11Voog CMS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in a niche environmental services market focused on geotechnical and geological investigations. Its business model is service-oriented, likely relying on project-based contracts. The website's limited content and lack of extensive business information suggest a small-scale operation. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The absence of social media presence and detailed business credentials limits competitive visibility. The company could improve market positioning by expanding digital presence and adding trust signals such as certifications or client testimonials.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@vgprojekti.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712631****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR best practices, which is a risk given the EU jurisdiction. Overall, the security posture is basic and should be enhanced to protect user data and improve trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

vides un ģeo projekti

Description:

Ģeotehniskā izpēte, ģeoloģiskā izpēte un gruntsūdens monitorings

Key Services:
Ģeotehniskā izpēteĢeoloģiskā izpēteGruntsūdens monitorings
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.2.1jQuery LazyLoad 1.9.7Picturefill 1.8.11Voog CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Voog tracking script
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Cloudflare

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 57 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:85.222.234.14
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: vgprojekti-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1682359005, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:179ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses the Voog CMS platform with standard front-end technologies including jQuery and Picturefill for responsive images. The site is mobile-optimized and has a moderate performance profile. However, no advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. The HTML and CSS appear valid and well-structured, but the lack of accessibility features and SEO optimizations limits reach and usability. The site does not implement advanced analytics or marketing tools, indicating a basic digital maturity level. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve SEO, and enhance accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website