Skip to main content

Is viesunamspupa.hotelonia.com a Scam? Security Check Results - hotelonia.com Reviews

viesunamspupa.hotelonia.com favicon

Is viesunamspupa.hotelonia.com Safe? Security Analysis for hotelonia.com

Check if viesunamspupa.hotelonia.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityN/asmall
jQueryPopper.jsTetherBootstrap 4Mobirise framework+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:53:28 AM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Hotelonia.com is an online hotel search and affiliate booking platform launched in 2022, targeting travelers and families seeking affordable hotel deals worldwide. The website offers a search form for hotels and apartments, linking users to affiliate booking pages. The business model relies on affiliate commissions from hotel bookings. The site is small in scale but presents a consistent brand and a user-friendly interface with good mobile optimization. Technically, it uses modern frontend frameworks such as Bootstrap and Mobirise, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, ensuring moderate performance and availability. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is limited to a contact form and no direct emails or phone numbers are provided. Overall, the site is legitimate and functional but could enhance trust and security features.

Detected Technologies

jQueryPopper.jsTetherBootstrap 4Mobirise frameworkFormoid

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Hotelonia.com operates in the hospitality sector as a hotel search engine and affiliate marketing platform. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating over 100,000 hotel deals and targeting family travelers with budget-friendly options. The business model is commission-based via affiliate links, with partnerships evident through subdomains handling tracking and specific hotel properties. The site’s growth potential depends on expanding affiliate partnerships and improving user engagement. The lack of direct contact details and limited privacy features may impact user trust. The company appears to be a small startup with no visible parent or subsidiary companies beyond branded subdomains.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, it lacks DNSSEC and important HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in case of security events. Forms are present but no explicit anti-CSRF or input validation mechanisms are visible. The absence of cookie consent and limited privacy compliance may expose the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

hotelonia.com

Description:

Find your next hotel at the best price. More than 100,000 Hotels deals. Travel with all your family.

Key Services:
Hotel searchHotel booking via affiliate linksApartment listings
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryPopper.jsTetherBootstrap 4Mobirise frameworkFormoid
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:167.86.114.90 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(60 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:167.86.114.90
Name Servers:
megan.ns.cloudflare.com
plato.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
3600: mail.hotelonia.com
SOA:Serial: 2379394888, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:138ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:167.86.114.90 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Mobirise CMS with Bootstrap 4 and common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Popper.js. It is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, which provide performance and some security benefits. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. However, no advanced analytics or tracking services were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site lacks modern security headers and DNSSEC, which are technical risks. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or slow loading elements. SEO is basic with meta description and alternate hreflang tags present but no structured data like JSON-LD detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small affiliate site but could benefit from modernization and security improvements.
Analyze Another Website