Skip to main content

Is vik-house.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Vik-House Reviews

V

Is vik-house.com Safe? Security Analysis for Vik-House

Check if vik-house.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateN/asmall
WordPress 6.3.5WooCommerce 3.9.2jQuery 3.7.0Bootstrap 4 (via theme)FontAwesome 5.15.1
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:09:38 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Vik-House is a small business specializing in the production and installation of modern wooden frame houses, leveraging Scandinavian technology and materials. The company has completed over 100 projects and supplies homes to multiple countries, positioning itself as a regional player in the real estate and manufacturing sectors. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Beaver Builder, providing a professional and user-friendly experience with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. However, the website lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and security policies, which impacts its compliance posture. Security-wise, the domain uses HTTPS and has transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, indicating room for improvement. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security measures.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.3.5WooCommerce 3.9.2jQuery 3.7.0Bootstrap 4 (via theme)FontAwesome 5.15.1

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets customers interested in energy-efficient, environmentally friendly wooden frame houses, offering design, manufacturing, installation, and finishing services. Its business model is based on manufacturing and selling prefabricated houses and related services. The presence of reputable partners like Vilpe, Knauf, and Isover strengthens its market position. The website content is relevant and professional, supporting the company's credibility. However, the lack of detailed contact information such as phone numbers or physical addresses may limit customer trust. The company appears to be newly established online (2023) but claims longer operational experience, possibly from prior business activities.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@vik-house.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces its security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in security readiness. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, minimizing privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Vik-House

Description:

Production and installation of modern wooden frame houses with over 7 years of experience in Europe and Scandinavia, supplying homes to 9 countries worldwide. Offers design, production, installation, and communications services for timber frame houses.

Key Services:
Design of wooden frame housesManufacturing of frame structures, panels, and roof trussesInstallation including foundation buildingLaying internal communications and finishing
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.3.5WooCommerce 3.9.2jQuery 3.7.0Bootstrap 4 (via theme)FontAwesome 5.15.1
Frameworks:
WooCommerceBB-Plugin (Beaver Builder)
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web17.garmtech.net a:ns2.garmtech.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1464-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

9 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(38 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:91.194.76.188
Name Servers:
ns1.garmtech.com
ns2.garmtech.com
ns3.garmtech.com
MX Records:
10: mail.vik-house.com
20: mx2.garmtech.com
SOA:Serial: 2023100205, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:145ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web17.garmtech.net a:ns2.garmtech.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern and popular CMS (WordPress) with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Beaver Builder for page building. The technology stack includes jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome, which are standard and well-supported. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is basic with proper meta tags but could be improved with more comprehensive metadata and structured data. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and landmarks present but no advanced accessibility features detected. The hosting provider is a reputable registrar, but no detailed hosting infrastructure information is available. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from performance and SEO enhancements.
Analyze Another Website