Skip to main content

Is vincentvanlaeken.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Vincent van Laeken Reviews

vincentvanlaeken.com favicon

Is vincentvanlaeken.com Safe? Security Analysis for Vincent van Laeken

Check if vincentvanlaeken.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery 3.5.1Splide.js 3.2.2
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 5:54:50 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Vincent van Laeken's website serves as a professional portfolio showcasing editorial and commissioned photography projects. The site targets art and fashion industry professionals and potential clients, presenting a curated collection of high-quality photographic works. The business model focuses on attracting commissions and editorial assignments through an elegant and visually driven online presence. Technically, the site is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as Splide.js and jQuery, ensuring a responsive and performant user experience. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers, which are important for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the active and professional nature of the site suggests legitimate use. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, adding clear contact details, and verifying domain registration status to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery 3.5.1Splide.js 3.2.2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website positions Vincent van Laeken as an independent photographer specializing in editorial and commissioned work within the media industry. The portfolio highlights collaborations with magazines and clients, indicating a niche focus on fashion and creative photography. The business operates on a small scale, leveraging digital presence to attract clientele. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The lack of contact information and business certifications limits transparency and potential client engagement. Growth opportunities include expanding contact channels and formalizing privacy and security practices to align with industry standards.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

B*****@vincentvanlaeken.comIG

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage implied by the URL. However, no security headers were detected, and there is no evidence of privacy or cookie policies, which are essential for GDPR compliance. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing exposure to input-based vulnerabilities. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable risk factor, potentially indicating domain registration issues. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, minimizing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Recommendations include adding security headers, privacy documentation, and verifying domain registration to enhance security maturity and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Vincent van Laeken

Description:

Portfolio website showcasing editorial and commissioned photography projects by Vincent van Laeken.

Key Services:
Editorial photographyCommissioned photography
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery 3.5.1Splide.js 3.2.2
Platforms:
Webflow
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional photography portfolio with multiple editorial and commissioned projects.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:icloud.com ~all v=spf1 mx a include:_spf.relay.mailprotect.be ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 24 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(239 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
ns1.combell.euDNS only
ns3.combell.net
ns4.combell.net
MX Records:
10: mx01.mail.icloud.com
10: mx02.mail.icloud.com
SOA:Serial: 1743587826, TTL: 40000s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:90ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:icloud.com ~all v=spf1 mx a include:_spf.relay.mailprotect.be ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS and employs modern front-end technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 3.5.1, and Splide.js for image sliders. The site is hosted on Webflow's CDN, contributing to fast load times and good mobile responsiveness. SEO optimization is basic with appropriate meta tags but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD. Accessibility features are minimal but present. No analytics or tracking tools are integrated, which may limit marketing insights. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO improvements.
Analyze Another Website